the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Design study of a rocket-borne free-flow aerosol collector for supersonic speed deployment by means of numerical efficiency analyzes
Abstract. The ice nuclei on which the cloud particles of mesospheric ice clouds, i.e. noctilucent clouds (NLC), form are largely unknown. Since in-situ measurements within NLC in about 85 km altitude are only possible by using sounding rockets, the careful design of an instrument to be deployed on board of the rocket is crucial. This study investigates the development of an inertia-based particle collector, which allows for sampling NLC particles during a sounding rocket flight for off-line single particle physico-chemical analyzes. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations support the design and development process in reference to a basic mechanical concept of particle sampling and sample storage, which is also presented here. Numerical studies of the supersonic flow field (Mach numbers 1.31 and 1.75) around the instrument module on the sounding rocket are carried out at different flow velocities (i.e. 300 m s−1 and 400 m s−1) and angles of attack (i.e., at +30°, 0° and −30°) for optimizing the aerodynamic design, arrangement, and orientation of the particle collectors. Thereby, the localization and extent of the occurring shock wave is investigated and the thickness of the boundary layer around the instrument module is determined to prevent the impairment of the particle sampling. Simulated particle trajectories based on particle radii of 0.6 nm at the lower limit of conceivable particle sizes confirm possible impactions on the collector surfaces. The investigations confirm the effectiveness of the designated particle collectors and render a yet pending rocket flight a valuable option in the investigation on the morphology, chemical composition, size, and number concentration of NLC particles and their nucleating particles.
Competing interests: Markus Rapp is a member of the editorial board of AMT
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(27826 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 09 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-510', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Mar 2025
reply
The scientific approach is rigorous and appropriate for the subject matter, and the overall structure, language, and presentation are of a very good standard. The authors demonstrate a clear understanding of the physical and numerical aspects of the problem, and the work contributes meaningfully to the field.
While the manuscript is already very well-prepared, I would like to offer a couple of suggestions that could further enhance its clarity and utility for the reader:
- It would be beneficial to include a table summarizing the boundary conditions applied to various surfaces of the computational domain (e.g., inlet, outlet, freestream, wall). Such a table provides clarity and helps the reader quickly grasp the simulation setup, especially when dealing with complex geometries or multiple flow regimes.
- While the use of a global Knudsen number is standard practice, it may obscure important local variations that are crucial in assessing the applicability of continuum-based or rarefied flow models. I suggest the inclusion of a figure illustrating the local Knudsen number distribution across the computational domain. This would serve as a more comprehensive diagnostic tool, offering insight into whether the flow remains within acceptable continuum or transitional limits throughout the domain, rather than only in an averaged sense.
These additions would not only enhance the scientific completeness of the manuscript but also assist readers and reviewers in better understanding the flow regime and the validity of the numerical approach.
In conclusion, I believe the manuscript is suitable for publication pending minor revisions as suggested above.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-510-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 | 36 | 4 | 129 | 2 | 4 |
- HTML: 89
- PDF: 36
- XML: 4
- Total: 129
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 38 | 29 |
Germany | 2 | 23 | 18 |
France | 3 | 20 | 15 |
China | 4 | 13 | 10 |
Brazil | 5 | 6 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 38