Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5084
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5084
24 Nov 2025
 | 24 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Identification and correction of snow depth bias in ERA5 datasets over Central Europe using machine learning

Gabriel Stachura and Zbigniew Ustrnul

Abstract. Accurate estimation of snow depth is a crucial problem from both meteorological and hydrological points of view. Global and regional reanalyses still struggle to address it, mostly because the scale of snow spatial heterogeneity is widely beyond current resolutions of the databases. In the study, snow depth estimation from Copernicus reanalyses ERA5 and ERA5-Land are compared and evaluated against point measurements in Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia in winter seasons 2001/2002–2020/2021. Additionally, a Random Forests (RF) model is developed to reduce identified errors based on various environmental variables and parameters derived from the reanalyses and a digital elevation model. As mountains are main snow water reservoirs for Central Europe, the model is then used to spatially downscale snow depth over a fine-scaled subdomain in mountainous terrain.

For both reanalyses, the deviations are relatively small in flat or gently rolling terrain (below 500 m a.s.l.). ERA5 (0.25°) outperforms ERA5-Land (0.1°) due to the presence of data assimilation. Since only synop measurements are assimilated, errors are the lowest for these stations, however, lower-ranked stations are also affected. In more complex terrain, both reanalyses exhibit an underestimation of snow that increases with elevation. In this area, ERA5-Land is slightly less biased due to its higher resolution and the fact that observations from mountainous sites are often masked out from the data assimilation in ERA5. The proposed RF model improves accuracy of estimation by around 48% with respect to the best reanalysis. The results of spatial downscaling certainly provide added value to the problem of snow estimation in complex terrain. Although they cannot be considered entirely valid and reliable since not all factors determining spatial variability of snow at such resolution are taken into account, they might be useful for future studies concerning, e.g., climatological variability of snow with respect to altitudinal zonation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Gabriel Stachura and Zbigniew Ustrnul

Status: open (until 05 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Gabriel Stachura and Zbigniew Ustrnul
Gabriel Stachura and Zbigniew Ustrnul

Viewed

Total article views: 70 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
56 9 5 70 3 3
  • HTML: 56
  • PDF: 9
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 70
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 70 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 70 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 27 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Reanalyses still struggle to accurately estimate snow depth, mostly because their horizontal resolution is beyond the spatial scale of snow variability. A comparison of two Copernicus reanalyses ERA5 and ERA5-Land reveals systematic errors and highlights the importance of data assimilation. A Random Forests model is able to reduce the systematic error by around a half. Spatial downscaling in complex terrain reflects mainly elevation-dependence but also shadowing effect of surrounding topography.
Share