the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A Unified Scheme for Modeling Saturation and Infiltration Excess Runoff
Abstract. Saturation excess and infiltration excess are two primary surface runoff generation mechanisms governing the timing and magnitude of streamflow at the catchment and larger scales. Despite their frequent co-occurrence and interconnections within catchments, most existing runoff schemes treat these mechanisms separately, following different theoretical paths. This study addresses this theoretical inconsistency by introducing a unified runoff scheme that integrates both mechanisms into a coherent framework. The scheme mathematically expresses both saturation and infiltration excess as functions of the probabilistic distribution of soil water storage, allowing dynamic transitions between mechanisms both in space and time based on the evolving soil water storage distribution during storm events. To demonstrate the applicability of this scheme, we developed a simple hydrologic model and tested it in 181 natural catchments over the U.S., spanning a range of humid to arid climates, and obtained Kling-Gupta efficiencies above 0.5 for 90 % and 70 % of the catchments during the parameter determination and validation periods, respectively. Results show that the model effectively captures the relative dominance of infiltration or saturation excess runoff at the event, seasonal, and annual scales. For instance, model results suggest that infiltration excess runoff dominates where the climate is arid and seasonal evaporative energy and precipitation are in phase, whilst saturation excess runoff dominates under other climate conditions. This unified scheme establishes a new foundation for enhancing the predictive understanding of runoff and other hydrological processes across diverse climates.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(1683 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1964 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5039', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Dec 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hongyi Li, 23 Feb 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5039', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Feb 2026
This manuscript presents a well-conceived and timely contribution to runoff generation modeling by unifying saturation-excess and infiltration-excess mechanisms within a single probabilistic framework. The theoretical development is clearly grounded in the probability distribution modeling traditions, and the application to 181 natural catchments across a range of hydroclimatic regimes demonstrates that the proposed URSSIE scheme can capture essential features of streamflow variability and the shifting dominance of runoff mechanisms from event to annual scales. The organization of results using the aridity index and the phasing between precipitation and evaporative demand is particularly effective in distilling complex process interactions into a small number of interpretable hydrologic regimes.
A few clarifications would, however, strengthen the manuscript. The assumed power-law relationship between soil moisture deficit and infiltration capacity should be presented more explicitly as a modeling closure guided by prior experimental and theoretical insights, rather than as a universally validated physical law, with a brief discussion of its implications and its role as an important direction for future empirical testing. Similarly, the assumption of a uniform groundwater depth, while consistent with many PDM/VIC-type approaches, would benefit from a short discussion of the hydrogeologic settings where it is most defensible and where caution is warranted. Finally, a concise characterization of those catchments that do not fit the three proposed climate–runoff categories, or where validation performance is weaker, would help delineate the current scope and limitations of URSSIE. With these additions, the paper will provide a clear and balanced presentation of a promising framework that can be readily built upon in subsequent studies.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5039-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hongyi Li, 23 Feb 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 413 | 258 | 40 | 711 | 67 | 27 | 25 |
- HTML: 413
- PDF: 258
- XML: 40
- Total: 711
- Supplement: 67
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 25
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This is a nice work, well conceived and presented. The URSSIE approach looks theorethically sound and promising for future applications. I have some comments in the attached file.