Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5038
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5038
21 Oct 2025
 | 21 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).

Polarity and direction dependence of energetic cross-frontal eddy transport in the Southern Ocean’s Pacific sector

Huimin Wang, Lingqiao Cheng, Erik Behrens, Zhuang Chen, Jennifer Devine, and Guoping Zhu

Abstract. Cross-frontal mesoscale eddies mediate meridional heat and mass transport across the Antarctic Circumpolar Current fronts. Yet their spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamical impacts in the Southern Ocean’s Pacific sector remain inadequately quantified. Utilizing 23 years (2000–2022) of satellite altimetry and Argo float data, we reveal, for the first time, a pronounced polarity and direction dependence in cross-frontal eddy (CFE) abundance, energetics, and interactions with jets. Equatorward-propagating cyclonic eddies (CEs) dominate CFE activity (36 % of total), exhibiting higher eddy kinetic energy (EKE, in terms of total EKE in eddy interiors, EKET), longer propagation distances, and stronger nonlinearity than other types, followed by poleward-moving anticyclonic eddies (AEs, 28 %). These two dominant directional groups primarily drive the significant increase in the overall CFEs’ EKET: CEs at (1.98 ± 1.53) × 106 m4 s2 yr1 (excluding the anomalously low 2017 value) and AEs at (1.58 ± 0.74) × 106 m4 s2 yr1. Specifically, complete CFEs (experience pre-crossing, crossing, and post-crossing phases) are responsible for these trends, distinct from non-CFEs, partial or transient CFEs, which show no trend. During frontal crossing, EKET enhances in equatorward CEs and poleward AEs but diminishes in poleward CEs and equatorward AEs, explaining the two former types’ capacity for long-distance propagation and energetic behaviors. The intensified CEs carry cold, fresh southern waters equatorward, while AEs transport warm, salty northern waters poleward. These cross-frontal exchanges mitigate thermohaline gradients between interfrontal zones while enhancing local mesoscale available potential energy. We conclude that CFEs serve dual climatic roles, in mediating meridional energy transport while dynamically stabilizing the ACC against strengthening winds.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Huimin Wang, Lingqiao Cheng, Erik Behrens, Zhuang Chen, Jennifer Devine, and Guoping Zhu

Status: open (until 16 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Huimin Wang, Lingqiao Cheng, Erik Behrens, Zhuang Chen, Jennifer Devine, and Guoping Zhu
Huimin Wang, Lingqiao Cheng, Erik Behrens, Zhuang Chen, Jennifer Devine, and Guoping Zhu
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 21 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
This study focused on the cross-frontal eddies (CFEs) in the Pacific sector. By analyzing 23 years of satellite and Argo float data, we found that the behaviors of these CFEs vary according to their polarity and direction. These powerful CFEs play a key role in moving heat and nutrients meridionally, and helping to counteract the effects of strengthening winds and inhomogeneous warming.
Share