Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5021
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5021
23 Oct 2025
 | 23 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Drivers of drought-induced canopy mortality in conifer and broadleaf forests across Luxembourg

Selina Schwarz, Fabian Ewald Fassnacht, Lisa Hülsmann, and Nadine Katrin Ruehr

Abstract. Climate change-induced weather extremes are increasing the intensity and frequency of disturbance events, posing a major threat to forests globally. In Central Europe, hotter and drier summers, such as those during the 2018–2020 drought period, have led to widespread forest damage. To adapt forests to a hotter and drier future it is important to identify sites more vulnerable to canopy mortality during drought, but high-resolution tree mortality data across a continuous landscape is still sparse.

This study aimed at filling this research gap by utilising a high-resolution (single-tree-level), spatially continuous dataset covering the entire Central European country of Luxembourg. We used generalized additive models (GAMs) to explore the contribution of biotic and abiotic site characteristics to the observed canopy mortality of conifer and broadleaf forests during the 2018–2020 summer droughts.

Our model explained 44.6 % of canopy mortality variation in conifers and 25.3 % in broadleaf forests. Clustered mortality patches spreading from one year to the other, typical for bark beetle infestation, were the strongest predictor of canopy mortality in conifer trees. Forest height also emerged as a strong predictor of mortality in both forest types. Surprisingly, we found limited influence of topography on canopy mortality. Our study highlights the potential of using high-resolution canopy mortality data across a national-scale study area to unravel the influence of site characteristics driving spatial variation in forest mortality during drought events.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Selina Schwarz, Fabian Ewald Fassnacht, Lisa Hülsmann, and Nadine Katrin Ruehr

Status: open (until 04 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Selina Schwarz, Fabian Ewald Fassnacht, Lisa Hülsmann, and Nadine Katrin Ruehr
Selina Schwarz, Fabian Ewald Fassnacht, Lisa Hülsmann, and Nadine Katrin Ruehr

Viewed

Total article views: 52 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
43 7 2 52 5 0 1
  • HTML: 43
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 52
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 52 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 52 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Climate change has increased droughts in recent years, damaging forests worldwide. We used a large data set and statistical analysis of dead trees across Luxembourg to find where forests were most affected and why. We found that conifer trees were more likely to be dead when nearby trees had already died, pointing to damage from bark beetles, while taller forests were also more vulnerable. These findings can help guide forest management and make forests more resilient to a future drier climate.
Share