Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5011
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5011
03 Nov 2025
 | 03 Nov 2025

Glacier surge activity over Svalbard from 1992 to 2025 interpreted using heritage satellite radar missions and Sentinel-1

Tazio Strozzi, Erik Schytt Mannerfelt, Oliver Cartus, Maurizio Santoro, Thomas Schellenberger, and Andreas Kääb

Abstract. Based on massive processing of heritage radar data from the satellite missions ERS-1/2, JERS-1, ENVISAT ASAR, ALOS PALSAR and Radarsat-2, and in combination with data from the current Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 missions, we compiled a ~30-year time series of radar backscatter over Svalbard. We exploited this data to detect glacier surges by using changes in backscatter as an indicator of increased or decreased surge-related crevassing. In this way, we reconstructed an as consistent as possible time series of surge activity on Svalbard for 1992 to 2025. We recorded 24 surge-type events during the pre Sentinel-1 period 1992–2014 (23 years) and 34 surge-type events during the post Sentinel-1 period 2015–2025 (11 years). This time series shows an approximately threefold increase in surges since 2015, from an average of about one surge per year to more than three surges per year. We show that this increase is unlikely to be explained alone by the better resolution, coverage and quality of the Sentinel-1 data compared to the data from the earlier SAR heritage missions. Simulation results indicate that the observed increase is extremely unlikely to be attributed to random perturbations in surge cyclicity, and instead suggest the influence of an external forcing mechanism. The number of surges during the recent decade seems high, but due to uncertainties in historical records, it remains unclear whether this frequency is exceptional or if earlier decades were unusually quiet. The cause of the observed threefold increase in surge activity also remains uncertain, given our incomplete understanding of surge initiation in relation to climate variability and non-climatic surge controls.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

23 Mar 2026
Glacier surge activity over Svalbard from 1992 to 2025 interpreted using heritage satellite radar missions and Sentinel-1
Tazio Strozzi, Erik Schytt Mannerfelt, Oliver Cartus, Maurizio Santoro, Thomas Schellenberger, and Andreas Kääb
The Cryosphere, 20, 1679–1697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-1679-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-1679-2026, 2026
Short summary
Tazio Strozzi, Erik Schytt Mannerfelt, Oliver Cartus, Maurizio Santoro, Thomas Schellenberger, and Andreas Kääb

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5011', Whyjay Zheng, 13 Dec 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5011', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Dec 2025

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5011', Whyjay Zheng, 13 Dec 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5011', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Dec 2025

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (02 Feb 2026) by Wesley Van Wychen
AR by Tazio Strozzi on behalf of the Authors (06 Feb 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (18 Feb 2026) by Wesley Van Wychen
AR by Tazio Strozzi on behalf of the Authors (27 Feb 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (09 Mar 2026) by Wesley Van Wychen
AR by Tazio Strozzi on behalf of the Authors (09 Mar 2026)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

23 Mar 2026
Glacier surge activity over Svalbard from 1992 to 2025 interpreted using heritage satellite radar missions and Sentinel-1
Tazio Strozzi, Erik Schytt Mannerfelt, Oliver Cartus, Maurizio Santoro, Thomas Schellenberger, and Andreas Kääb
The Cryosphere, 20, 1679–1697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-1679-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-1679-2026, 2026
Short summary
Tazio Strozzi, Erik Schytt Mannerfelt, Oliver Cartus, Maurizio Santoro, Thomas Schellenberger, and Andreas Kääb
Tazio Strozzi, Erik Schytt Mannerfelt, Oliver Cartus, Maurizio Santoro, Thomas Schellenberger, and Andreas Kääb

Viewed

Total article views: 940 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
528 372 40 940 75 30 27
  • HTML: 528
  • PDF: 372
  • XML: 40
  • Total: 940
  • Supplement: 75
  • BibTeX: 30
  • EndNote: 27
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 932 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 932 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Mar 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
By analysing 30 years of satellite SAR data, we have found that the number of glacier surges over Svalbard has tripled since 2015. We show that this increase is unlikely to be explained solely by improvements in data quality or by random fluctuations in surge frequency, suggesting that this trend is caused by an external forcing mechanism. Given our incomplete understanding of surge initiation, the cause of the observed threefold increase remains however uncertain.
Share