Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4997
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4997
19 Nov 2025
 | 19 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Seasonal Cycle Biases in DGVM Simulations of Double-Cropping Systems: A Case Study in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain

Shengjie Zhou, Tiexi Chen, Yingying Cui, Xin Chen, Shuci Liu, and Zhe Gu

Abstract. Global dynamic vegetation models (DGVMs) are essential tools for studying the changes in terrestrial ecosystems and their responses to climate change and human activities. However, these models exhibit substantial uncertainties when applied to croplands, particularly in regions with multiple cropping systems. These uncertainties arise from variations in planting types and phenology, which are influenced by sowing and harvesting schedules. This study focused on the phenological estimation errors of DGVMs in typical double - cropping agricultural regions. The Huang - Huai - Hai Plain in eastern China was chosen, which is one of the most important grain-producing areas with mainly winter wheat-summer crop rotation. A comparative analysis was conducted between the seven models from the TRENDY project and three remote sensing observations over last two decades. The results indicate that remote sensing vegetation indices consistently exhibit a typical bimodal structure in the study area, with peaks in April and August, corresponding to the growth peaks of the two-season crops. However, none of the DGVMs successfully capture this bimodal pattern. Given that multiple cropping systems are widespread in middle- and low-latitude regions with favorable water and temperature conditions, improving the simulation capabilities of DGVMs in such areas is an urgent and critical issue for advancing global vegetation modeling.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Shengjie Zhou, Tiexi Chen, Yingying Cui, Xin Chen, Shuci Liu, and Zhe Gu

Status: open (until 31 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Shengjie Zhou, Tiexi Chen, Yingying Cui, Xin Chen, Shuci Liu, and Zhe Gu
Shengjie Zhou, Tiexi Chen, Yingying Cui, Xin Chen, Shuci Liu, and Zhe Gu

Viewed

Total article views: 113 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
92 11 10 113 19 7 7
  • HTML: 92
  • PDF: 11
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 113
  • Supplement: 19
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 109 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 109 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
This research evaluates how global vegetation models simulate crop growth in eastern China’s double-cropping farmlands. Satellite observations reveal two clear growth peaks each year, while models reproduce only one. This mismatch limits our understanding of regional greening and carbon cycling. Incorporating realistic farming practices into global models is essential for more accurate assessments of agriculture and climate interactions.
Share