Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4987
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4987
27 Nov 2025
 | 27 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Interpreting carbon-water trade-offs in Daisy crop model using Pareto-based calibration

Laura Delhez, Eric Laloy, Quentin Beauclaire, and Bernard Longdoz

Abstract. Improving the simulation of carbon and water exchanges is crucial for reliable crop modelling under changing climate conditions. Although model calibration is a key step, optimising multiple outputs can be challenging and often reveals trade-offs between calibration objectives. We applied a Pareto-based multi-objective calibration with the Speed-constrained Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimisation (SMPSO) algorithm to the Daisy soil–plant–atmosphere model, targeting dry matter (DM), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and latent heat flux (LE) of winter wheat crops.

The optimal parameter set achieved good accuracy for all objectives (RMSE = 0.948 t ha-1 for DM, 1.49 gC m-2 day-1 for daily NEE and 30.7 W m-2 for daily LE) but revealed singular trade-offs. The strong compromise between dry matter and NEE likely suggests wrong parameterisation and measurement bias, while the trade-off between NEE and LE reflects equifinality issues from evapotranspiration partitioning. Lastly, this analysis also pointed out limitations in simulating stomatal regulation during heatwaves conditions, supporting the decoupling between transpiration and carbon assimilation. These findings show that Pareto-based calibration can also serve as a diagnostic tool, identifying structural weaknesses and guiding targeted improvements in process representation for more robust crop model evaluation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Laura Delhez, Eric Laloy, Quentin Beauclaire, and Bernard Longdoz

Status: open (until 08 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Laura Delhez, Eric Laloy, Quentin Beauclaire, and Bernard Longdoz
Laura Delhez, Eric Laloy, Quentin Beauclaire, and Bernard Longdoz
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Using an advanced optimisation method, we calibrated a crop model against dry matter, carbon and water exchanges. Although model predictions matched observations well, the process revealed weaknesses in the model, such as difficulty in representing evapotranspiration, especially during heatwaves. This multi-objective approach highlighted the need to better capture stomatal and non-stomatal responses in order to improve predictions of crop models.
Share