Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4978
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4978
27 Nov 2025
 | 27 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

BiasCast: Learning and adjusting real time biases from meteorological forecasts to enhance runoff predictions

Oliver Konold, Moritz Feigl, Patrick Podest, Christoph Klingler, and Karsten Schulz

Abstract. The use of deep learning models in hydrology is becoming an ever more prevalent application in operational flood forecasting. Such operational systems face performance degradation when transitioning from high quality reanalysis to meteorological forecast data with lower accuracy. This study investigates training strategies and Long Short-Term Memory network architectures to mitigate forecast-induced bias in maximum daily discharge predictions using the Extended LamaH- CE dataset and a subset of 451 basins. We systematically evaluated cross-domain generalization, transfer learning approaches, Encoder–Decoder LSTMs, Sequential Forecast LSTMs, and the role of input embeddings and integrating past discharge observations. The results show that domain shifts between reanalysis and forecast data lead to substantial skill loss, with median Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency decreasing from 0.58 to 0.33. Among the tested strategies, the Sequential Forecast LSTM demonstrated the most stable improvements, achieving a median NSE of 0.63. Integrating recent discharge observations further enhanced performance, raising median NSE to 0.71 and surpassing even the reanalysis-driven baseline. In contrast, integrating archived forecasts or using more complex input embeddings did not yield consistent benefits and in some cases degraded model stability. These findings highlight the value of training strategies that allow models to directly learn bias correction during forecast transitions and emphasize the operational potential of combining sequential processing with near real-time discharge observations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Oliver Konold, Moritz Feigl, Patrick Podest, Christoph Klingler, and Karsten Schulz

Status: open (until 08 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Oliver Konold, Moritz Feigl, Patrick Podest, Christoph Klingler, and Karsten Schulz

Data sets

Experimental Setups and Results for "BiasCast: Learning and adjusting real time biases from meteorological forecasts to enhance runoff predictions" Oliver Konold et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17241922

Extended LamaH-CE: LArge-SaMple DAta for Hydrology and Environmental Sciences for Central Europe Oliver Konold et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17119634

Model code and software

Forked NeuralHydrology Version Oliver Konold https://github.com/conestone/neuralhydrology

Interactive computing environment

Experiments and Results Code for "BiasCast: Learning and adjusting real time biases from meteorological forecasts to enhance runoff predictions" Oliver Konold https://github.com/conestone/biascast

Oliver Konold, Moritz Feigl, Patrick Podest, Christoph Klingler, and Karsten Schulz

Viewed

Total article views: 84 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
69 13 2 84 1 1
  • HTML: 69
  • PDF: 13
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 84
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 82 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 82 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Flood forecasting systems depend on weather forecasts. However, weather forecasts always have an error when compared with historical observations. This causes flood predictions to become less accurate when switching from historical to forecast data. We tested artificial intelligence (AI) methods across 451 European river basins to address this challenge and found that using appropriate model design can turn this accuracy problem into something the system can learn to fix "on the fly".
Share