the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Response characterization of Cosmic-Ray Neutron Sensors in neutron metrology reference fields
Abstract. Soil moisture is recognized as an Essential Climate Variable (ECV) by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), as it plays a key role in hydrology, agriculture, and climate by regulating land–atmosphere interactions such as evapotranspiration, groundwater recharge, and surface runoff. Despite its importance, existing monitoring methods operate at different spatial and temporal scales and remain poorly harmonized, leading to inconsistencies among datasets. The SoMMet (Soil Moisture Metrology) project addresses this gap by developing robust metrological tools to ensure consistent and comparable soil moisture observations.
Within this framework, the neutron response functions of commercial Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensing (CRNS) detectors (Hydroinnova CRS1000, Hydroinnova CRS2000/B, and StyX Neutronica S1) were characterized in radionuclide-based neutron reference fields (252Cf, moderated 252Cf, and 241Am-Be), covering the full energy range relevant to CRNS applications. The experimental campaign was carried out at two neutron metrology laboratories: PTB (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany) and CIEMAT (Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Spain). Monte Carlo simulations of the detector response were performed using MCNP and adjusted based on experimental data obtained at both facilities.
Independent validations were conducted at PTB and CIEMAT using monoenergetic neutron reference fields (from 24 keV to 5 MeV) and radionuclide reference sources, yielding agreement within 12 % between the experimental data and the validated simulations. These results provide the first benchmark data for CRNS detector models under reference conditions, representing a key step toward establishing robust SI-traceable calibration frameworks and harmonized deployment in soil moisture monitoring applications.
- Preprint
(40464 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4825', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Dec 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', María de los Ángeles Millán Callado, 14 Jan 2026
reply
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your thorough review and valuable suggestions.
To make the discussion process as straightforward as possible, we have prepared a detailed point-by-point response addressing each of your comments individually. This response letter is attached to this comment for your convenience.
We hope our revisions and explanations fully address your concerns. We remain available to clarify any point further or to extend the discussion if needed.
Sincerely,
The Authors -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', María de los Ángeles Millán Callado, 14 Jan 2026
reply
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your thorough review and valuable suggestions.
To make the discussion process as straightforward as possible, we have prepared a detailed point-by-point response addressing each of your comments individually. This response letter is attached to this comment for your convenience.
We hope our revisions and explanations fully address your concerns. We remain available to clarify any point further or to extend the discussion if needed.
Sincerely,
The Authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', María de los Ángeles Millán Callado, 14 Jan 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 224 | 120 | 24 | 368 | 121 | 113 |
- HTML: 224
- PDF: 120
- XML: 24
- Total: 368
- BibTeX: 121
- EndNote: 113
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Comments to editors
As I have said in my comments to the authors, I found this to be a clearly written and logically laid out manuscript. It covers an important measurement technique and should definitely be published. I can find nothing wrong with what has been done, and my comments are largely suggestions for alterations to make the text easier to understand for a non-expert in the field and to avoid possible misunderstandings.
Comments to the authors are in separate PDF file. I have tried to remove all personal data from the properties, but may not have been completely successful. I would be grateful if you could check that.