the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Characteristics of gauged abrupt wave fronts (walls of water) in flash floods in Scotland
Abstract. Extremely rapid rates of rise in river level and discharge are a subset of flash floods (‘abrupt wave front floods’, AWFs) and are separate hazards from peak river level. They pose a danger to life to river users and occur mainly in the summer. The rate of change in gauged river level and discharge can be used to assess and compare the severity of AWF events within and between catchments. We use several metrics of discharge severity to investigate AWFs on 260 Scottish gauged catchments. We use the full flow record for each station and map the occurrence of maximum 15 min change in river levels and discharge. We map a further three measures to compare risk between catchments including the multiple of the 15 min flow increase from the initial to terminal discharge. The concurrent increase in velocity is difficult to measure but wave celerity can be assessed where there are observations of the time of wave onset at more than one point on a channel. We investigate several such events on the River Findhorn in northeast Scotland. Such events need better monitoring forecasting and warning, particularly as extreme downpours are becoming more frequent with global warming.
- Preprint
(2022 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(278 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Apr 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-456', Duncan Faulkner, 14 Mar 2025
reply
It is good to see that the authors' work on this important, previously-neglected hydrological hazard has been extended into Scotland. I offer just a few comments from a quick look the paper.
The use of Q15 to mean annual maximum rise in discharge over 15-minutes is a potential cause of confusion (especially for any readers who, like I did, start from the conclusions and work backwards). Q15 is commonly used in hydrology to refer to the 15th percentile on a flow duration curve. I suggest a change in terminology. Also I'd suggest rephrasing " annual maximum values of rise in level and discharge" to "annual maximum values of rise in level and rise in discharge", to avoid any misunderstanding.
There are several other instances where some rephrasing could aid clarity such as "coincidence between level and flow station maxima" which I believe is intended to refer to maximum rates of rise. LIkewise, does the "the mean maximum 15 min rise " refer to the mean of the annual maxima? And does the median in section 3.1 refer to the median of the annual maxima? Later, this is called RoRMED.
In 3.2, the authors should state that c refers to celerity, and give the units of all variables.
I cannot see that Eqn 1 is consistent with the definition given above. For one thing, it has no expression of maximisation.
It seems unfortunate that the first examples presented, in section 1, are all in the north of England rather than in Scotland, given the title of the paper.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-456-CC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
58 | 9 | 2 | 69 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
- HTML: 58
- PDF: 9
- XML: 2
- Total: 69
- Supplement: 22
- BibTeX: 0
- EndNote: 0
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1