Soil moisture droughts in Belgium during 2011–2020 were the worst in five decades
Abstract. In recent years, Belgium has experienced a sequence of intense droughts with wide-ranging impacts across multiple sectors. Determining whether these events are unprecedented or within natural variability requires indicators that properly diagnose drought. Root-zone soil moisture is a suitable indicator because it integrates meteorological forcings with land-surface processes. In Belgium, however, operational monitoring relies mainly on precipitation-based indices and lacks long-term in-situ soil-moisture observations, leaving uncertainty about whether these indices capture the persistence of root-zone drought. To address this gap, we reconstructed daily root-zone soil-moisture dynamics over Belgium for 1970–2020 using the mesoscale Hydrologic Model (mHM), placing recent droughts in historical context and evaluating the adequacy of precipitation-based indicators for representing drought conditions. Our analysis shows that droughts in 2011–2020 were unprecedented in both duration and severity over the past five decades. Between 2011 and 2020, the country experienced a cumulative three years of drought (non-consecutive), representing 30 % of the decade, more than double the cumulative duration in each decade from 1981–2010 and about 1.5 times that of 1971–1980. We further find that the Standardized Precipitation–Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), currently used operationally as a proxy for agricultural droughts in Belgium, underestimates the persistence of root zone droughts because it does not explicitly account for land-surface memory. Thus, by including soil moisture monitoring in drought assessment, residual stresses on agriculture and subsurface water, which can persist long after meteorological conditions have normalized can still be detected. This gives decision-makers a more realistic understanding of droughts and how to respond proportionately.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
In this paper, data from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) were used; however, the Terms and Conditions were not followed. Specifically, the rule on acknowledgement and citation was disregarded, which states:
"Whenever data distributed by the ISMN are used for publication, the data's origin (i.e., the original data provider and the ISMN) must be acknowledged and referenced. A reference to both the ISMN and all networks providing data for the study in question shall be given."