Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4512
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4512
25 Sep 2025
 | 25 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

On the Weather Impact of Contrails: New Insights from Coupled ICON–CoCiP Simulations

Ulrich Schumann and Axel Seifert

Abstract. Contrail forecasts typically neglect feedbacks with the atmosphere. Here, we investigate the contrail-weather interaction using a two-way coupling of the Contrail Cirrus Prediction model (CoCiP) with the global non-hydrostatic numerical weather model ICON. ICON includes a new two-moment cloud ice microphysics scheme that enables skillful predictions of ice supersaturation, validated against radiosonde observations and compared with ECMWF forecasts. The CoCiP model uses a new method to limit the uptake of ambient ice supersaturation when many contrails form. Radiative effects of contrails are calculated using the ecRad radiation scheme within ICON. The models are coupled using the YAC coupler to exchange atmospheric and contrail state variables after each ICON time step. The coupled system results are broadly consistent with offline CoCiP simulations, but captures additional feedbacks. The significance of the computed contrail effects is tested by comparison to numerical noise perturbation or twin experiments of the results of two forecasts differing by small random factors in the initial values. The instantaneous radiative forcing (RF) by the contrails exhibits slightly higher global mean values and a more nonlinear dependence on optical depth than previous standalone CoCiP estimates. Contrails induce a butterfly effect that reduces weather predictability after a few days. Hence, contrails are predictable – but only for a finite period. The global mean forecast simulations reveal short-term atmospheric impacts of contrails, including warming at flight levels, as expected. Effects on surface temperature and precipitation appear regionally random, with negligible global mean values before the butterfly effect dominates the results.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ulrich Schumann and Axel Seifert

Status: open (until 06 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ulrich Schumann and Axel Seifert
Ulrich Schumann and Axel Seifert

Viewed

Total article views: 729 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
718 7 4 729 5 2
  • HTML: 718
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 729
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 725 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 725 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Contrails caused by aircraft flying in sufficiently cold and humid air masses, have a weather and a climate impact. For reduction of the climate impact one should avoid flights forming warming contrails. This requires good weather forecast of contrail formation conditions. We present a two-way coupling of the Contrail Cirrus Prediction model (CoCiP) with the global non-hydrostatic icosahedral numerical weather model ICON. We find that contrails are predictable – but only for a finite period.
Share