the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluating the EPICC-Model for Regional Air Quality Simulation: A Comparative Study with CAMx and CMAQ
Abstract. This study presents a systematic evaluation of China’s independently developed the EPICC-Model for regional PM2.5 and MDA8 O3 simulations against established international models, using unified WRF meteorological fields and a multi-source integrated emission inventory. Results highlight the strengths of the EPICC-Model in several aspects: it achieves relatively high spatial consistency for PM2.5, with an annual index of agreement (IOA) of 0.80, and accurately captures pollution patterns in heavily polluted North China. It also demonstrates improved performance in simulating summer O3 peaks, reducing maximum biases by more than 20 μg m-3, primarily through enhanced heterogeneous HONO formation and nitrate photolysis pathways that elevate OH concentrations, and it incorporates the CB6r5 mechanism to better represent biogenic VOC oxidation. The model exhibits the highest hit rate (45.6 %) for identifying moderate PM2.5 and moderate O3 pollution events and successfully reproduces persistent compound pollution episodes. However, all models share common limitations, including insufficient capability in reproducing heavy pollution episodes, systematic underestimation of SO42-, and uncertainties in SOA-related OC simulations. Future improvements should focus on refining secondary aerosol chemistry, emission inventories, and boundary layer representations. This study has not only demonstrated the performance of the EPICC-Model against international benchmarks but also provides guidance for improving regional and global air quality models.
- Preprint
(3094 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4978 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 30 Dec 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4441', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Nov 2025 reply
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4441 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 07 Dec 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlYou have archived your the code and data used in your work (with the exception of one Zenodo repository) in sites that do not comply with our policy and requirements. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular. Please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible, as we can not accept manuscripts in Discussions that do not comply with our policy. Also, please include the relevant primary input/output data.
In your reply to this comment, please, include a new version of the "Code and Data Availability" section of your manuscript that addresses and solve all the mentioned issues.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4441-CEC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 283 | 54 | 20 | 357 | 35 | 16 | 13 |
- HTML: 283
- PDF: 54
- XML: 20
- Total: 357
- Supplement: 35
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Publisher’s note: a supplement was added to this comment on 11 December 2025.
Please see my review in the attached file.