Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4397
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4397
18 Sep 2025
 | 18 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Inferring the Controlling Factors of Ice Aggregation from Targeted Cloud Seeding Experiments

Huiying Zhang, Fabiola Ramelli, Christopher Fuchs, Nadja Omanovic, Anna J. Miller, Robert Spirig, Zhaolong Wu, Yunpei Chu, Xia Li, Ulrike Lohmann, and Jan Henneberger

Abstract. Ice aggregation in clouds plays a crucial role in cloud development and precipitation formation. Despite the significance of ice aggregation, direct in situ quantification of aggregation rates in natural clouds has been challenging due to the difficulty of tracking ice crystals. Here, we present in situ measurements of ice aggregation rates in persistent supercooled stratiform clouds. Using novel glaciogenic seeding experiments (CLOUDLAB), ice crystals are nucleated upwind and subsequently measured downwind after a known residence time in cloud, allowing us to estimate their age. A deep-learning-based detection algorithm (IceDetectNet) counts the individual monomers of aggregates to derive the initial ice crystal number concentration (ICNCt0). We considered several factors that may influence ice aggregation, including ICNCt0, temperature, particle size, aspect ratio, and turbulence. Among these, ICNCt0 was found to be the dominant factor controlling aggregation rates by three independent approaches: causal inference, a physical equation, and machine learning models. We report, however, a subquadratic dependence of the aggregation rate on ICNCt0 (mean exponent ~0.92), in contrast to theoretical expectations (quadratic dependence). One possible explanation is that aggregation may also involve smaller ice crystals, but this remains hypothetical. To predict aggregation rates, we evaluated 11 machine learning models and a physically based formulation. CatBoost achieved the best statistical performance, while the physical model proved more robust in sensitivity tests. These findings provide new insights into the microphysical and environmental controls of ice aggregation and establish a robust methodological foundation for studying aggregation processes in natural clouds.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Huiying Zhang, Fabiola Ramelli, Christopher Fuchs, Nadja Omanovic, Anna J. Miller, Robert Spirig, Zhaolong Wu, Yunpei Chu, Xia Li, Ulrike Lohmann, and Jan Henneberger

Status: open (until 30 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Huiying Zhang, Fabiola Ramelli, Christopher Fuchs, Nadja Omanovic, Anna J. Miller, Robert Spirig, Zhaolong Wu, Yunpei Chu, Xia Li, Ulrike Lohmann, and Jan Henneberger
Huiying Zhang, Fabiola Ramelli, Christopher Fuchs, Nadja Omanovic, Anna J. Miller, Robert Spirig, Zhaolong Wu, Yunpei Chu, Xia Li, Ulrike Lohmann, and Jan Henneberger
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Ice crystals in clouds aggregate, shaping snow and rain, yet rates are hard to measure. Using cloud seeding, we sampled crystals downwind after known times. A deep-learning algorithm quantified aggregation by counting crystal components. Initial ice concentration was the main driver, confirmed by causal analysis, physics, and machine learning, though weaker than theory predicts. Temperature, size, and shape also mattered, while turbulence was negligible.
Share