Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4343
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4343
26 Sep 2025
 | 26 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Technical note: Euclidean Distance Score (EDS) for algorithm performance assessment in aquatic remote sensing

Amanda de Liz Arcari, Juliana Tavora, Daphne van der Wal, and Mhd. Suhyb Salama

Abstract. In the absence of community consensus, there remains a gap in standardized, consistent performance assessment of remote-sensing algorithms for water-quality retrieval. Although the use of multiple metrics is common, whether reported individually or combined into scoring systems, approaches are often constrained by statistical limitations, redundancy, and dataset- and context-dependent normalizations, leading to subjective or inconsistent interpretations. To address this, we propose the Euclidean Distance Score (EDS), which integrates five statistically appropriate and complementary metrics into a composite score. Capturing three core aspects of performance (regression fit, retrieval error, and robustness), EDS is computed as the Euclidean distance from an idealized point of perfect performance, providing a standardized and interpretable measure. We demonstrate the applicability of EDS in three scenarios: assessing a single algorithm for different retrieved variables, comparing two algorithms on shared retrievals, and evaluating performance across contrasting trophic conditions. By offering an objective framework, EDS supports consistent validation of aquatic remote sensing algorithms and transparent comparisons in varied contexts.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Amanda de Liz Arcari, Juliana Tavora, Daphne van der Wal, and Mhd. Suhyb Salama

Status: open (until 07 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Amanda de Liz Arcari, Juliana Tavora, Daphne van der Wal, and Mhd. Suhyb Salama
Amanda de Liz Arcari, Juliana Tavora, Daphne van der Wal, and Mhd. Suhyb Salama

Viewed

Total article views: 305 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
290 13 2 305 2 1
  • HTML: 290
  • PDF: 13
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 305
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 299 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 299 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 30 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We developed a new way to evaluate how well remote sensing-based methods estimate water quality. Instead of relying on many separate indicators, which can give conflicting results, we created a single score that combines them into one objective measure. This approach makes it easier to compare methods across different conditions and helps researchers and managers choose the best tools for understanding and monitoring our aquatic environments.
Share