Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4341
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4341
17 Sep 2025
 | 17 Sep 2025

Opinion: The importance and future development of perturbed parameter ensembles in climate and atmospheric science

Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth

Abstract. A grand challenge in climate science is to translate advances in our fundamental understanding into reduced uncertainty in climate projections Model uncertainty, characterized for example by the spread of simulations of future climate projections, has changed little over the past few decades despite major advances in model complexity, resolution, and the growing number of intercomparison projects and observational datasets. Here we argue that the use of perturbed parameter ensembles (PPEs) would accelerate our understanding of uncertainty in its broadest sense and help identify strategies for reducing it. We make eleven recommendations for future research priorities, drawing on existing studies that use PPEs to guide model development and simplification, understand inter-model differences, more fully characterize the plausible spread in climate projections, formalize model calibration, define observational requirements, and investigate how interacting environmental conditions influence complex climate systems like cloud fields. These studies extend across climate, weather, atmospheric chemistry, clouds, aerosols and renewable energy using process-based high-resolution models through to global-scale models. Although increases in model complexity, resolution and intercomparison projects consume most computing resources today, we argue that, in synergy with these efforts, PPEs are essential for fully characterizing model uncertainty and improving model reliability, and that they should be prioritized when allocating those resources.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

09 Apr 2026
| Highlight paper
Opinion: The importance and future development of perturbed parameter ensembles in climate and atmospheric science
Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren R. Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4651–4667, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4651-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4651-2026, 2026
Short summary Editorial statement
Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4341', Bjorn Stevens, 04 Oct 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4341', Bjorn Stevens, 12 Oct 2025
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4341', Michael Schulz, 30 Nov 2025

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4341', Bjorn Stevens, 04 Oct 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4341', Bjorn Stevens, 12 Oct 2025
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4341', Michael Schulz, 30 Nov 2025

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Ken Carslaw on behalf of the Authors (30 Jan 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (06 Feb 2026) by Ivy Tan
ED: Publish as is (17 Feb 2026) by Barbara Ervens (Executive editor)
AR by Ken Carslaw on behalf of the Authors (04 Mar 2026)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

09 Apr 2026
| Highlight paper
Opinion: The importance and future development of perturbed parameter ensembles in climate and atmospheric science
Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren R. Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4651–4667, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4651-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4651-2026, 2026
Short summary Editorial statement
Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth
Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth

Viewed

Total article views: 3,389 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,953 394 42 3,389 47 56
  • HTML: 2,953
  • PDF: 394
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 3,389
  • BibTeX: 47
  • EndNote: 56
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,191 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,191 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Apr 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
A major challenge in climate science is reducing projection uncertainty despite advances in models and observational constraints. Perturbed parameter ensembles (PPEs) offer a powerful tool to explore and reduce uncertainty by revealing model weaknesses and guiding development. PPEs are now widely applied across climate systems and scales. We argue they should be prioritized alongside complexity and resolution in model resource planning.
Share