Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-419
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-419
12 Feb 2025
 | 12 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Opinion: Improved scientific discourse and quality assurance by interactive open access publishing with community-based multi-stage open peer review in an open science landscape

Barbara Ervens, Ken S. Carslaw, Thomas Koop, and Ulrich Pöschl
Editorial note: the preprint was edited on 13 and 21 February 2025. A part of the title was adjusted from "public peer review" to "multi-stage open peer review" and the expression "multi-stage public peer review" in the abstract was adjusted to "multi-stage open peer review".

Abstract. Scientific discourse and quality assurance can be improved by open science through public peer review and community discussion of preprints on open access (OA) publishing platforms. Over 25 years, the viability and benefits of this approach have been proven by the interactive OA journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) and 18 other journals published by the European Geosciences Union (EGU) and the scientific service provider Copernicus Publications. The success of the EGU journals employing multi-stage open peer review reflects the attractiveness and benefits of community-driven, interactive OA publishing, including high scientific quality and impact, efficient self-regulation, low cost and financial sustainability. Since 2001, EGU has published over 50 000 journal articles, 60 000 preprints, and 250 000 interactive comments, utilizing and integrating different financing models of OA (green, gold, diamond/platinum). The EGU interactive OA journals are linked to the OA repository and interactive community platform EGUsphere and to the virtual scientific highlight magazine EGU Letters, integrating different levels of scientific communication and exchange. The EGU publications combine multiple features of open science, including different forms of open peer review and community evaluation with open access, open data, and open source elements tailored to the needs and preferences of different disciplines. We review the approach, achievements and future perspectives of interactive OA publishing (including transformative/institutional agreements and AI/ML tools) and its contribution to a universal epistemic web that captures the scientific discourse and comprehensively documents what we know, how well we know it, and where the limitations are.

Competing interests: Two of the authors are members of the editorial board, and two authors are members of the advisory board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Barbara Ervens, Ken S. Carslaw, Thomas Koop, and Ulrich Pöschl
Editorial note: the preprint was edited on 13 and 21 February 2025. A part of the title was adjusted from "public peer review" to "multi-stage open peer review" and the expression "multi-stage public peer review" in the abstract was adjusted to "multi-stage open peer review".

Status: open (until 02 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-419', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Mar 2025 reply
Barbara Ervens, Ken S. Carslaw, Thomas Koop, and Ulrich Pöschl
Editorial note: the preprint was edited on 13 and 21 February 2025. A part of the title was adjusted from "public peer review" to "multi-stage open peer review" and the expression "multi-stage public peer review" in the abstract was adjusted to "multi-stage open peer review".
Barbara Ervens, Ken S. Carslaw, Thomas Koop, and Ulrich Pöschl
Editorial note: the preprint was edited on 13 and 21 February 2025. A part of the title was adjusted from "public peer review" to "multi-stage open peer review" and the expression "multi-stage public peer review" in the abstract was adjusted to "multi-stage open peer review".

Viewed

Total article views: 536 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
465 64 7 536 23 7 8
  • HTML: 465
  • PDF: 64
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 536
  • Supplement: 23
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 541 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 541 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Mar 2025
Download

Please read the editorial note first before accessing the preprint.

Short summary
Over the past two decades, the European Geosciences Union (EGU) has demonstrated the success, viability and benefits of interactive open access (OA) publishing with public peer review in its journals, its publishing platform EGUsphere and virtual compilations. The article summarizes the evolution of the EGU/Copernicus publications and of OA publishing with interactive public peer review at large by placing the EGU/Copernicus publications in the context of current and future global open science.
Share