the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PM2.5 Assimilation within JEDI for NOAA's Regional Air Quality Model (AQMv7): Application to the September 2020 Western U.S. Wildfires
Abstract. This paper describes efforts to establish aerosol data assimilation capabilities for NOAA’s National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC), a regional online air quality modeling (AQM) system under NOAA’s Unified Forecast System (UFS), by assimilating measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particles with diameters less than 2.5 µm). PM2.5 assimilation is developed within the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) framework and tested using its 3D-Var data assimilation (DA) component. The PM2.5 observation operator is constructed by combining newly developed PM2.5 transformation recipes in the JEDI Variable Derivation Repository (VADER) with a general spatial interpolation operator in the Unified Forward Operator (UFO). Cycled DA and forecast experiments were conducted from 1 to 21 September 2020, during a period of Western U.S. wildfires, to assess the impact of assimilating PM2.5 observations from the AirNow and PurpleAir networks. The control and analysis variables include individual aerosol species, with background error standard deviations generated by scaling their respective background values. Prognostic variables such as aerosol particle number and total particulate surface area are updated accordingly following each analysis update. All DA experiments use a 3-hourly cycling interval, with PM2.5 observations assimilated every 3 hours. The control experiment uses the same configuration but without any data assimilation. Results show that assimilating either AirNow or PurpleAir PM2.5 data reduces 1–24 h forecast errors in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the control run over CONUS. Forecast skill, measured using the Critical Success Index (CSI) for PM2.5 thresholds of 5, 12, and 35 µg/m³, also improves. AirNow observations have a greater impact overall, while PurpleAir shows its strongest impact over Nevada, northern Utah, Colorado, and southwestern New Mexico – regions with persistent underpredictions in the control run at forecast hour 1. Overall, the assimilation of PurpleAir observations in addition to AirNow data leads to a slight reduction in 3–24 h MAE.
- Preprint
(16112 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Nov 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4098', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Oct 2025 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4098', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Nov 2025
reply
General comments:
This study introduces assimilating PM₂.₅ observations from AirNow and PurpleAir networks within JEDI for AQMv7, and analysized the assimilation benefits by conducting several experiments. The work is important and within the scope of GMD, and the manuscript is well-structured overall. However, there are still some concerns require to be addressed to further improve the quality of the manuscript before its publication.
Major comments:
(1) Data assimilation of PM2.5 observations has been extensively studied. This study demonstrates the value of assimilating novel observations from PurpleAir for improving numerical air quality predictions. But the unique features or advantages of the PurpleAir network have not been fully demonstrated. It is suggested that the authors further strengthen the explanation of the novelty of this study.
Minor comments:
(1) The authors cited several webpages such as in Lines 58, 106, and 394 of the manuscript. It should be noted that web-based references have stability risks due to periodic or irregular maintenance of websites. If a cited page becomes inaccessible, for example the EPA webpage in L394, readers would be unable to verify the definition of "Regions 1–10", leading to confusion in subsequent region-based statistical analyses in the manuscript. Therefore, it is recommended that essential contextual information be incorporated in the manuscript to enhance completeness and readability. If the authors deem webpage citations necessary, the citation format should be revised to align with the requirement of the journal.
(2) Figure8 (middle row, right panel) shows an increase in MAE over the eastern U.S. Does it indicate limilations of the PA data or its assimilation in these region during the study period, and why.
(3) Figure8: The colorbar ranges in the top and bottom row of the left panel looks truncated. It is suggested to expand the colorbar range to fully capture the extent of MAE reduction. Meanwhile, it is recommended that each panel within multi-panel figures be labeled with letters (a, b, c, etc.) to facilitate clear referencing in the manuscript text.
(4) In Lines 88, 129, 211, 217: The "2.5" in "PM2.5" should be formatted as subscript to follow the convention and keep consistent with the others in the manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4098-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 287 | 39 | 13 | 339 | 11 | 9 |
- HTML: 287
- PDF: 39
- XML: 13
- Total: 339
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Comments attached as pdf