Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3895
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3895
09 Sep 2025
 | 09 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

A Human-Portable Mass Flux Method for Methane Emissions Quantification: Controlled Release Testing Performance Evaluation

Coleman Vollrath, Thomas Barchyn, Abbey Munn, Clay Wearmouth, and Chris Hugenholtz

Abstract. Quantifying methane (CH4) emissions from anthropogenic sources is essential for compliance, inventory, and verification efforts. One established mass balance approach is the mobile flux plane method, in which emissions can be estimated from measurements of CH4 at various heights. Most traditional applications require either a drone or aircraft, both of which can be expensive, or limiting to deploy in all situations. To broaden applicability and improve practicality, we adapted the flux plane method using a long telescoping pole and backpack-mounted CH4 sensor. We explored accuracy through 44 controlled release experiments (0.2–5.6 kg CH4/h) from a 2.4 m stack. Measurements were taken at 6 heights (0.8–5.6 m) by walking transects 10–30 m downwind. The data yielded a mean relative error of -10.1 %, with 68 % of estimates within ±38.3 % of true values. Results are comparable to drone-based methods. We also tested an optimized Gaussian plume model using partial vertical profiles to address issues where the pole could not measure the top of the plume. This approach was slightly less accurate than the flux plane method but had less bias. Overall, results show that multi-level, telescoping pole-based CH4 measurements combined with flux plane or Gaussian models can quantify emissions from elevated sources in a logistically practical manner with results comparable to other widely used mobile quantification methods.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Coleman Vollrath, Thomas Barchyn, Abbey Munn, Clay Wearmouth, and Chris Hugenholtz

Status: open (until 15 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Coleman Vollrath, Thomas Barchyn, Abbey Munn, Clay Wearmouth, and Chris Hugenholtz
Coleman Vollrath, Thomas Barchyn, Abbey Munn, Clay Wearmouth, and Chris Hugenholtz

Viewed

Total article views: 194 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
190 4 0 194 1 1 0
  • HTML: 190
  • PDF: 4
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 194
  • Supplement: 1
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 193 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 193 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Method feasibility and practicality are important considerations for quantifying methane emissions. This study adapted the flux plane mass balance method to a rapidly deployable, operationally flexible, and user-friendly, human-portable telescoping pole-based system. Controlled release test results suggest that the pole method can be applied to moderate height sources at closer downwind distances with performance similar to other widely used mobile quantification methods.
Share