the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measurement report: Dust impact on hygroscopicity and volatility of submicron aerosols: Based on the observation in April of Beijing
Abstract. Understanding the aerosol hygroscopicity and volatility is crucial for determining their effects on the environment and climate. As a typical natural aerosol, the dust impact on fine particles' hygroscopicity and volatility remains inadequately understood. Simultaneous measurements of aerosol hygroscopicity and volatility were performed using Volatility-Hygroscopicity Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer during April 2024 in Beijing. During this period, mean hygroscopic growth factor (HGF) of 50, 80, 110, 150, 200, and 300 nm were 1.20±0.07, 1.28±0.07, 1.32±0.07, 1.36±0.08, 1.40±0.09, and 1.43±0.13, respectively. The mean volatile shrink factor (VSF) was 0.48±0.05, 0.52±0.04, 0.53±0.05, 0.53±0.06, 0.53±0.07, and 0.54±0.10. Particles from anthropogenic emissions were dominated by more hygroscopic and volatile components, while particles influenced by natural sources (such as dust) had lower hygroscopicity and volatility. The case study highlighted the impact of dust on hygroscopicity and volatility for accumulated mode particles. Before dust arrival, more hygroscopic and very volatile mode were more prominent, and HGF increased and VSF decreased with diameter. When dust arrived, the number fraction of more hygroscopic mode (NFMH) dropped to 0.54 (200 nm) and 0.33 (300 nm), while number fraction of very volatile mode (NFVV) fell to 0.73 (200 nm) and 0.47 (300 nm), respectively. This reflected a shift toward the hydrophobic and non-volatile components. During dust period, the size dependence showed that HGF peaked at 150 nm and declined, whereas VSF rose with diameter. The mean HGF and VSF at 300 nm were 1.20 and 0.74 during dust period, suggesting that particles at 300 nm were hydrophobic and less volatile.
- Preprint
(2102 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(519 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 08 Oct 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3796', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Oct 2025 reply
Data sets
Measurement report: Dust impact on hygroscopicity and volatility of submicron aerosols: Based on the observation in April of Beijing Xinyao Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16957115
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,825 | 23 | 7 | 1,855 | 18 | 16 | 23 |
- HTML: 1,825
- PDF: 23
- XML: 7
- Total: 1,855
- Supplement: 18
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Review of “Measurement report: Dust impact on hygroscopicity and volatility of submicron aerosols: Based on the observation in April of Beijing” by Hu et al.
This manuscript investigates the hygroscopicity and volatility of submicron aerosols during a one-month campaign in urban Beijing. The authors present temporal variability in relation to meteorological parameters and PM₂.₅/PM₁₀ mass concentrations, provide a statistical overview of the campaign, analyze air-mass back trajectories, and examine the impact of air mass on aerosol properties. Particular attention is given to a short dust event, with a comparison of aerosol hygroscopicity and volatility before, during, and after the episode.
The topic is relevant and of potential interest to the community, particularly with respect to understanding the role of dust in influencing aerosol hygroscopic properties. However, I find that the current manuscript has several limitations that, in its present form, raise concerns regarding its suitability for publication in ACP. Below I provide detailed comments and suggestions for improvement:
Overall approach and novelty
The manuscript is largely descriptive, particularly in Sections 3.1 and 3.2. The discussion would benefit from a stronger connection to existing literature, as the current version does not sufficiently highlight what is novel compared to earlier studies from the region. I encourage the authors to clarify the new insights gained from this dataset and to better emphasize the scientific significance of their results.
Scope and dataset
The dataset, consisting of one month of HV-TDMA measurements without complementary observations of aerosol chemical composition or other physical/optical properties, appears rather limited. As presented, the analysis remains descriptive, which may not meet the standards expected for ACP. The authors may consider expanding the contextualization of their results within the broader body of work on aerosol hygroscopicity and volatility to strengthen the manuscript.
Title and focus on dust event
The title suggests a comprehensive assessment of dust impacts; however, the analysis relies on a single, short-lived dust event (approximately 6 hours). Drawing broad conclusions on dust impacts from such limited data seems overly ambitious. A more cautious framing of the study in the title and conclusions would be appropriate. Ideally, a longer dataset including multiple dust events would allow for more robust evaluation of dust effects on aerosol properties.
Characterization of the dust event
Additional supporting information would help establish the identification of this episode as a dust event. How exactly is the event defined? While changes in the fine/coarse ratio are a useful indicator, dust events (especially those associated with long-range transport) typically last longer than a few hours. It would strengthen the analysis to incorporate additional observational evidence (e.g., satellite data, lidar, or ground-based measurements) if available. I also note that the link provided to the Beijing Meteorological Observatory does not appear to work and should be updated or replaced.
Recommendations for improvement
Rather than centering the study on the short dust episode, I recommend the authors consider broadening the scope of their analysis to other features of the campaign dataset. For example, the six identified pollution episodes may provide a stronger basis for discussion and allow for more meaningful conclusions regarding aerosol hygroscopicity and volatility. Additionally, engaging more deeply with the existing literature would improve the scientific context and highlight the added value of this dataset.