Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3785
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3785
18 Aug 2025
 | 18 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Uncertainty in Land Carbon Fluxes Simulated by CMIP6 Models from Treatments of Crop Distributions and Photosynthetic Pathways

Joseph Ovwemuvwose, Ian Colin Prentice, and Heather Graven

Abstract. A reliable representation of the diversity of vegetation in terrestrial ecosystems is needed for the accurate simulation of present and future biogeochemical cycling and global climate, particularly as climate change affect different vegetation types differently. We compare the distributions of crops and of C3 versus C4 photosynthetic pathways in both natural vegetation and crops across Earth System Models in the 6th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). We find a large range in vegetation type for area, gross primary production (GPP) and carbon stock change in both natural vegetation and croplands across the models. Even though 10 of 11 models used Land Use Harmonization (LUH2) crop areas as input data, modeled total crop area ranges from -28 to +10 % of the data-based estimate. The C3 and C4 crop areas were -56 to +15 % and -100 to +38 % of LUH2 for 2014, respectively. The C4 fraction of total vegetation area in the models is 9–25 %, compared to 17 % in observation-based estimates. Total global GPP varies by a factor of two across the models, and the C4 fraction of GPP ranges from 12 to 27 %. Simulated trends in the fraction of GPP by C3 versus C4 vegetation type (-20 to +29 %) would have changed global isotopic discrimination by -0.35 to +0.11 ‰ over 1975–2005, indicating that modeled changes in vegetation type do not account for the +0.7 ‰ increase indicated by atmospheric data. Disparity in vegetation types contributes to uncertainty in land carbon fluxes and further constraints and improvements in models are needed.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Joseph Ovwemuvwose, Ian Colin Prentice, and Heather Graven

Status: open (until 02 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Joseph Ovwemuvwose, Ian Colin Prentice, and Heather Graven

Data sets

CMIP6 models data Output Different groups https://esgf-node.ipsl.upmc.fr/projects/cmip6-ipsl/

Interactive computing environment

Jupyter notebook used for the CMIP6 models analysis and data visualisation Joseph Ovwemuvwose https://zenodo.org/records/16883407

Joseph Ovwemuvwose, Ian Colin Prentice, and Heather Graven

Viewed

Total article views: 743 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
722 16 5 743 13 10 16
  • HTML: 722
  • PDF: 16
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 743
  • Supplement: 13
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 704 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 704 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
This work examines the role of cropland representation and the treatment of photosynthetic pathways in the uncertainties in the carbon flux simulations in Earth System Models (ESMs). Our results show that reducing these uncertainties will require improvement of the representation of C3 and C4 crops and natural vegetation area coverage as well as the theories underpinning the simulation of their carbon uptake and storage processes.
Share