Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3533
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3533
27 Aug 2025
 | 27 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Validation of TROPOMI and WRF-Chem NO2 across seasons using SWING+ and surface observations over Bucharest

Antoine Pasternak, Jean-François Müller, Catalina Poraicu, Alexis Merlaud, Frederik Tack, and Trissevgeni Stavrakou

Abstract. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are key pollutants involved in ozone and particulate matter formation, with strong spatial variability near urban sources. Accurate monitoring of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is essential for air quality management and relies on validated chemistry transport models and multi-scale observations. This study evaluates the WRF-Chem model v4.5.1, run at 1 km resolution over Bucharest, Romania, using in situ meteorological data and surface chemical measurements, as well as airborne NO2 columns from 17 SWING+ flights conducted between 2021 and 2022. The model successfully captures key atmospheric processes and NO2 variability across all but one observation period. Our results indicate that anthropogenic NOx emissions from CAMS-REG v7.0 are underestimated, with satisfactory agreement with observations achieved when the emissions are scaled by a factor of 1.5. We also assess TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 columns v2.4.0 using SWING+ as reference, with WRF-Chem used as an intercomparison platform to account for differences in sampling and vertical sensitivity. TROPOMI biases range from +20 % at low concentrations (1015 molec. cm-2) to –13 % at higher levels (15 × 1015 molec. cm-2). Additionally, we provide seasonal diagnostics, a detailed treatment of uncertainty estimates, and contextualize our findings through a review of recent TROPOMI NO2 validation studies.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Antoine Pasternak, Jean-François Müller, Catalina Poraicu, Alexis Merlaud, Frederik Tack, and Trissevgeni Stavrakou

Status: open (until 16 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Antoine Pasternak, Jean-François Müller, Catalina Poraicu, Alexis Merlaud, Frederik Tack, and Trissevgeni Stavrakou
Antoine Pasternak, Jean-François Müller, Catalina Poraicu, Alexis Merlaud, Frederik Tack, and Trissevgeni Stavrakou

Viewed

Total article views: 1,633 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,607 24 2 1,633 7 17 18
  • HTML: 1,607
  • PDF: 24
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 1,633
  • Supplement: 7
  • BibTeX: 17
  • EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,773 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,773 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a major air pollutant with strong spatial variability near urban sources. We use the WRF-Chem model to simulate NO2 levels over Bucharest and compare the results with in situ, aircraft, and TROPOMI satellite measurements. We find that CAMS-REG emissions are likely underestimated, and that TROPOMI NO2 accuracy varies with pollution levels. Our results align with previous studies and contribute to improving the interpretation of satellite data for air quality monitoring.
Share