the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Event-based analysis of extreme precipitation trends in Italy using hourly convection-permitting reanalyses
Abstract. The latest generation of high-resolution and convection-permitting reanalyses, capable of representing atmospheric processes at small spatial scales (≤4 km), is crucial for studying the temporal and spatial evolution of phenomena such as convective storms and orographic precipitation. Given the availability of long (>35 years) and continuous convection-permitting reanalysis datasets over Italy, this study investigates the occurrence and characteristics of hourly extreme precipitation events (EPEs) and quantifies their potential increase over time in this region. Using the MERIDA HRES reanalysis (1986–2022), precipitation events are extracted from hourly fields as spatially coherent structures, yielding approximately 160,000 events per year. Each event is characterized by intensity and shape indicators. The resulting HOPE-X (HOurly Precipitation Events and Xtremes) dataset enables a detailed climatological analysis of event frequency, intensity, and spatial scale across seasons. The most extreme component of those events (EPEs), defined based on the mean of local annual maxima in hourly precipitation (RX1hour), show a pronounced increase in occurrence. Specifically, significant upward trends are present during summer in several Alpine and Prealpine regions, as well as in parts of Calabria. In autumn, significant signals emerge in the southern Apennines and in coastal and maritime areas, including the eastern Ligurian coast, eastern Sardinia, the southern Adriatic Sea, and the Ionian Sea. These spatial and seasonal patterns align with regions where convective processes predominantly drive intense, localised precipitation, potentially amplified by climate change. While these findings should be considered in light of known limitations of reanalysis products, such as spatial mismatches with observations and temporal inhomogeneities, multiple independent observational studies support the increase in EPEs during summer and autumn in specific areas. Moreover, the methodology presented here is broadly applicable in any region with access to long-term convection-permitting reanalysis data. In summary, this study offers a contribution to the ongoing discussion on precipitation extremes in Italy and provides guidance for leveraging reanalysis data to enhance infrastructure resilience to short-lived, intense precipitation events.
- Preprint
(7950 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2240 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 16 Sep 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3455', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Aug 2025
reply
The manuscript presents reanalyses model simulation results on convective-permitting scales over Italy with hourly resolution. The study is important since understanding precipitation and provides a method of studying events at hourly scales. Extreme precipitation trends on an hourly basis are important for assessing flood risk, especially as these trends are expected to increase with a warming climate, even in drying areas. The paper is generally well written, and the figures are well presented, however there are a few major concerns, along with some minor comments, that I hope the authors will address in order for the article to be suitable for publication.
General comments
A major concern is that the title and abstract of the paper describe extremes, while a lot of the results and figures describes the full dataset compared to the extreme analysis. The Result section should be altered to highlight the extreme analyses better and maybe reduce the description and figures around the full dataset to better suit the journal. Another major concern is that with the weight given on extremes in titles and abstract, there is only one threshold for extremes used which also is set very high, especially when considering hourly data. Above the mean of 37 datapoints which give only 18-19 events per grid cell if the events are evenly distributed around the mean (a quick calculation sets this threshold around the 9.995 percentile). The threshold applied to define extreme precipitation is exceptionally high, and with so few events included, the resulting trend estimates are highly uncertain. The robustness of the study would be improved if additional analyses were carried out using several lower thresholds, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment of trends.
Specific Comments
Page 2. L27-29: Even drying areas experience more extreme precipitation events.
Page 5. Section 2.2 Median is easier than the 50th percentile, and used earlier in Introduction.
The Method section needs to be improved to better understand the results presented. Section 2.2 should be rewritten to increase readability. The thresholds and smoothing are first presented, and then described again in the later paragraph, maybe rewrite for better readability. Line 162 – 165 More specifically, … this sentence in especially hard to follow. More than half in which instances?
I’m also curious how time is handled as an event usually lasts more than one hour. Is there any clustering in time?
Section 2.4 Is this Gaussian filter the same as used in section 2.2? If so, does the justification of this radius apply to the earlier smoothing, and move this part in section 2.2?
Table 2, The table could be improved if the names were included in addition to the short names.
Page 9. L196 ERA5 is already introduced as the driver of the dataset.
Page 10, l207-208 Explain better here: How many events would this give over a typical grid cell on the coast or in the mountains?
Page 20. L 358-359: This analysis would also benefit from a lower threshold, as two executive hours above RX1hour is extremely rare.
Page 22. L 423-424, This sentence could be misinterpreted, there could be trends here that were not found because of issues with the reanalysis. Could there be a false positive trend, or a false insignificant trend?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3455-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Francesco Cavalleri, 05 Sep 2025
reply
We sincerely thank you for your valuable comments and constructive suggestions on our manuscript. Please find attached a detailed response to your general and specific remarks. Your observations will be carefully considered and addressed in the revised version of the manuscript.
With kind regards,
Francesco Cavalleri, on behalf of all authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Francesco Cavalleri, 05 Sep 2025
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3455', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Sep 2025
reply
Please find my comments in the attachment.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Francesco Cavalleri, 05 Sep 2025
reply
We sincerely thank you for your valuable comments and constructive suggestions on our manuscript. Please find attached a detailed response to your general and specific remarks. Your observations will be carefully considered and addressed in the revised version of the manuscript.
With kind regards,
Francesco Cavalleri, on behalf of all authors
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Francesco Cavalleri, 05 Sep 2025
reply
Data sets
HOPE-X (HOurly Precipitation Events and Xtremes) from MERIDA HRES Reanalysis Francesco Cavalleri https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15772543
Model code and software
EPEs Francesco Cavalleri https://github.com/fcavalleri/EPEs
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
965 | 61 | 15 | 1,041 | 35 | 14 | 22 |
- HTML: 965
- PDF: 61
- XML: 15
- Total: 1,041
- Supplement: 35
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1