the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Open Global Glacier Data Assimilation Framework (AGILE) v0.1
Abstract. The growing availability of glacier observations poses a challenge for models to integrate this heterogeneous information in a dynamically consistent way. At the same time, estimates of current glacier volume and area remain uncertain, as many global inventories and thickness datasets date back to the early 2000s. We present the Open Global Glacier Data Assimilation Framework (AGILE), a time-dependent variational method inspired by 4D-Var data assimilation. AGILE is built on a reimplementation of the OGGM flowline glacier evolution model in PyTorch, enabling full differentiability through automatic differentiation (AD). We test AGILE v0.1 in a series of idealized experiments designed to reflect common initialization and calibration scenarios in global glacier modeling. The goal is to recover glacier bed topography and distributed ice volume in 2020 through transient calibration, based on dynamical simulations starting in 1980. In these experiments, we assume a perfectly known mass balance and fixed ice dynamics parameters. While this setup simplifies real-world complexity, it allows us to isolate and evaluate the core functionality of the approach. Our results show that AGILE efficiently optimizes multiple control variables by leveraging AD-derived gradients, requiring only a few iterations to substantially improve upon initial guesses. We also examine the potential to reconstruct earlier glacier states (e.g., in 1980) without direct observations and find that this is fundamentally limited by the diffusive nature of glacier dynamics, even in an idealized setting. Overall, our experiments demonstrate AGILE’s potential as a flexible and efficient data assimilation framework. Its ability to integrate diverse datasets in a dynamically consistent manner makes it a promising tool for future real-world glacier modeling applications.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Geoscientific Model Development.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(3529 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(707 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3401', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Sep 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Patrick Schmitt, 30 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3401', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Oct 2025
Please see the attached PDF for my detailed review. The manuscript is of high scientific quality, includes clear and transparent documentation of the experiments. The presented method has strong potential for substantial advances in glacier modeling; I recommend acceptance after minor revisions to enhance presentation quality.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Patrick Schmitt, 30 Nov 2025
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3401', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Sep 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Patrick Schmitt, 30 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3401', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Oct 2025
Please see the attached PDF for my detailed review. The manuscript is of high scientific quality, includes clear and transparent documentation of the experiments. The presented method has strong potential for substantial advances in glacier modeling; I recommend acceptance after minor revisions to enhance presentation quality.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Patrick Schmitt, 30 Nov 2025
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 399 | 93 | 32 | 524 | 46 | 27 | 25 |
- HTML: 399
- PDF: 93
- XML: 32
- Total: 524
- Supplement: 46
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 25
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
See attachment.