Iceberg Detection Based on the Swin Transformer Algorithm and SAR Imagery: Case Studies off Prydz Bay and the Ross Sea, Antarctic
Abstract. Icebergs pose persistent hazards to maritime navigation and offshore operations. In Antarctica, grounded offshore icebergs may gradually melt, altering the local ocean stratification conditions. This in turn influences coastal ocean circulation, sea ice dynamics, and thermodynamics. Accurately identifying the spatiotemporal distribution of icebergs is essential for both maritime operations and oceanographic research. In this study, we developed an iceberg detection algorithm based on the Swin transformer model (IDAS-Transformer). The IDAS-Transformer, along with a support vector machine (SVM) and a residual network (ResNet18), was applied to four synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images acquired over Prydz Bay and the Ross Sea, which represented a landfast ice zone, a drift ice zone, and an open ocean. The coverage area of each image was 80 km × 80 km. Manual interpretation was employed to generate reference data for algorithmic evaluation purposes. The iceberg concentration, defined as the area occupied by icebergs per grid unit, along with the total number of icebergs and their average size, was introduced to provide a quantitative iceberg detection assessment. We found that the IDAS-Transformer performed well across various sea ice conditions, and a total of more than 800 icebergs were detected. Both the F1 scores and the kappa coefficients of the model exceeded 85 %. The total number of identified icebergs and their area presented mean biases of +4.13 % and +3.65 %, respectively. The IDAS-Transformer outperformed the other two tested algorithms. The sea ice concentration affects the iceberg detection process, with the main challenge being the separation of icebergs from similarly textured pack ice in complex ice-covered regions. Furthermore, distinguishing icebergs that are smaller than 160 m × 160 m among large ice floes remains difficult.
Competing interests: I declare that neither I nor my co-authors have any competing interests.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.