Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3200
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3200
22 Aug 2025
 | 22 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Recovery under consecutive disasters: how recovery dynamics shape societal resilience

Sophie L. Buijs, Inga J. Sauer, Chahan M. Kropf, Samuel Juhel, Zélie Stalhandske, and Marleen C. De Ruiter

Abstract. Consecutive disasters, where two or more disasters occur in succession before recovery from the first event has been completed, can have non-linear impacts on societies that can surpass the effects isolated events. Drawing on empirical examples and insights from scientific literature, we explore how consecutive disasters affect societal recovery across four interconnected pillars of society: human settlements, human health, economic systems, and socio-political systems. We identify pathways through which repeated disasters can either erode a community's ability to effectively respond to and recover from disasters or provide opportunities for social learning and positive change. By examining both immediate and long-term effects, we show how societies might be pushed towards critical tipping points, resulting in either a systemic breakdown of societal resilience, or transformative adaptation and improved capacity to manage future risks. Recognising these dynamics underscores the need for a long-term, multi-hazard approach to disaster risk reduction. Recovery planning must move beyond short-term, reactive measures toward integrated, forward-looking strategies, supported by reliable, proactive, and equitable financing mechanisms. Addressing the complexity of recovery under consecutive disasters is essential for both research and policy to enable adaptive, resilient societies in a future of increasingly frequent and intense hazards.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sophie L. Buijs, Inga J. Sauer, Chahan M. Kropf, Samuel Juhel, Zélie Stalhandske, and Marleen C. De Ruiter

Status: open (until 09 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sophie L. Buijs, Inga J. Sauer, Chahan M. Kropf, Samuel Juhel, Zélie Stalhandske, and Marleen C. De Ruiter
Sophie L. Buijs, Inga J. Sauer, Chahan M. Kropf, Samuel Juhel, Zélie Stalhandske, and Marleen C. De Ruiter

Viewed

Total article views: 824 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
760 58 6 824 14 11
  • HTML: 760
  • PDF: 58
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 824
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 11
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 819 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 819 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We studied how repeated disasters affect recovery across housing, health, economic systems, and governance. Our findings show that failing to recover fully between events can increase long-term risks but also offers opportunities for learning and adaptation. Understanding these dynamics can help societies plan better, reduce vulnerability, and build resilience to increasingly frequent and severe hazards.
Share