the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Adaptation of methane oxidising bacteria to environmental changes: implications for coastal methane dynamics
Abstract. Global warming induced alterations in ocean temperature regimes, and precipitation patterns are increasingly impacting coastal ecosystems, leading to shifts in water column properties. These changes may have profound implications for microbial communities such as methane-oxidising bacteria (MOBs), which play a critical role in regulating methane fluxes and ecosystem dynamics. In this study, we investigate the resilience and adaptability of aerobic MOBs in response to changing environmental conditions. Through microcosm incubation experiments with waters from the North Sea and the Wadden Sea collected during different seasons, we explore how variations in methane availability, temperature, and salinity influence the MOB community structure and functional capacity. Our results reveal an increase in the relative abundance of MOBs to up to 57 % in experiments with elevated methane concentrations, highlighting the primary role of methane availability for MOB community development. Temperature and salinity variations, on the other hand, exerted lesser effects on MOB composition and relative abundance. A strong effect on MOB community development was furthermore caused by the origin of the inoculum (location and season). Our results thus suggest a functional redundancy in the variable pools of microbial inocula enabling multiple MOB clades to cope with drastic changes in environmental parameters. The adaptability of MOB communities is key to understand their role in mitigating methane emissions from coastal regions in a future ocean with potentially elevated methane, temperature and variable salinity levels.
Competing interests: Helge Niemann is associate editor of BG
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(922 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(371 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 01 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-316', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Mar 2025
reply
The manuscript “Adaptations of methane oxidising bacteria to environmental changes” describes the diversity of methane oxidizing community under natural conditions and after experimental modifications.
Overall, the study is well written, however there are some major concerns:
There is a mix between environmental observations and the experimental modifications. For the environmental observations the authors describe 2 locations at 4 seasons and 2 water depths. These should be described in a single way, so the readers can easily see if there is for example an influence of water depth or season on the MOB community.
However, as these environmental set-ups are quickly combined with the experiments, these basic and natural description of the MOB community remains unclear.
The experimental set ups involve modifications of the methane concentrations (3 levels), salinity (4 levels) and temperature (3 levels). First it should be explained why these levels were chosen in comparison to the natural range of these factors. The temperature range seems rather high, does the North Sea ever has water temperatures > 25°? What about lower temperatures < 15°? For the methane concentrations it should be clarified how much 5% CH4 in the headspace relates to nmol/L of dissolved methane; and how these concentrations relate to the natural concentrations at the study site. The same holds for the chosen levels of salinity. The incubation time of 20 – 30 days seems to be rather long. Can the authors verify that other parameters such as oxygen concentrations, depletion of nutrients or biofilm on the glass bottle were not changing the system off from the "normal" situation?
As the authors have chosen to use 3 experimental factors, a full factorial analysis would include a full combination of all three factors, i.e. 3 x 4 x 3 = 36 combinations. A subsequent ANOVA could then state if these factors do have a significant influence on the MOB diversity. Therefore, the experimental part of the Ms should formulate clear hypothesis, which than can be accepter or not, such as: methane does have an influence on the diversity. In addition, it could be shown (maybe with a heat map) at which combination a specific MOB group has a preference for which experimental combination.
As it is now in the Ms there are certainly a lot of information, but the reader (or at leas I) remains confused about the presented results. Thus I recommend a separation of environmental and experimental results. For the experimental results, either each parameter or better combination of parameters should be described separately.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
124 | 25 | 5 | 154 | 21 | 6 | 4 |
- HTML: 124
- PDF: 25
- XML: 5
- Total: 154
- Supplement: 21
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 58 | 37 |
Netherlands | 2 | 15 | 9 |
China | 3 | 14 | 8 |
Germany | 4 | 11 | 7 |
France | 5 | 6 | 3 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 58