Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3046
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3046
14 Aug 2025
 | 14 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

First Arctic-wide assessment of SWOT swath altimetry with ICESat-2 over sea ice

Felix L. Müller, Florian Seitz, and Denise Dettmering

Abstract. This study presents an Arctic-wide assessment of the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission's swath observations of sea surface height. SWOT provides measurements in two-dimensional swaths and enables pixel-based height information with a resolution of 250 metres up to a latitudinal limit of 78° N. Although SWOT doesn’t cover the central Arctic, it provides insights into SSH at an unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. The quality of these innovative observations in such a challenging environment is evaluated through comparison with data from ICESat-2. Approximately one year of sea level anomaly data, collected between March 2023 and April 2024, is used at around 550 regionally distributed crossover locations, with measurements taken within 30 minutes. Sentinel-1 SAR imagery supports the comparisons if available. Visual comparisons of SWOT and ICESat-2 with Sentinel-1 grey-scale values reveal clear coherence. However, small-scale surface features aren’t captured by SWOT as equally as by ICESat-2. The data shows absolute water level differences of about 5 cm, despite prior harmonisation of references and corrections. Differences of up to 50 cm can occur when comparing left- and right-hand SWOT swaths, mainly during winter and in areas with long sea ice coverage. This may be due to issues with the height correction from the crossover calibration. Quantitative point-by-point comparisons show mean standard deviations of about 8 cm for all surface types and 6 cm if restricted to ICESat-2-detected leads. Higher deviations are found during the early melting period between May and June, in the Canadian Archipelago and the Greenland Sea.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Felix L. Müller, Florian Seitz, and Denise Dettmering

Status: open (until 26 Sep 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Felix L. Müller, Florian Seitz, and Denise Dettmering
Felix L. Müller, Florian Seitz, and Denise Dettmering

Viewed

Total article views: 756 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
704 51 1 756 31 25
  • HTML: 704
  • PDF: 51
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 756
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 25
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 751 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates SWOT’s wide-swath sea surface height observations across the Arctic by comparing them with ICESat-2 altimetry and Sentinel-1 SAR imagery. Using data from over 550 crossovers between March 2023 and April 2024, the analysis shows good agreement, with mean absolute water differences of around 5 cm, but also larger discrepancies during winter and early melt. These results illustrate both the potential but also arising problem areas of swath altimetry in the polar regions.
Share