<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">EGUsphere</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>EGUsphere</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">EGUsphere</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">EGUsphere</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub"></issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/egusphere-2025-3046</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>First Arctic-wide assessment of SWOT swath altimetry with ICESat-2 over sea ice</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Müller</surname>
<given-names>Felix L.</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4219-0407</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seitz</surname>
<given-names>Florian</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-6069</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dettmering</surname>
<given-names>Denise</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-4639</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Technical University of Munich, Germany; TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Aerospace &amp; Geodesy,  Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI-TUM)</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2025</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>18</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2025 Felix L. Müller et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3046/">This article is available from https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3046/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3046/egusphere-2025-3046.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3046/egusphere-2025-3046.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>This study presents an Arctic-wide assessment of the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission&apos;s swath observations of sea surface height. SWOT provides measurements in two-dimensional swaths and enables pixel-based height information with a resolution of 250 metres up to a latitudinal limit of 78&amp;deg; N. Although SWOT doesn&amp;rsquo;t cover the central Arctic, it provides insights into SSH at an unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. The quality of these innovative observations in such a challenging environment is evaluated through comparison with data from ICESat-2. Approximately one year of sea level anomaly data, collected between March 2023 and April 2024, is used at around 550 regionally distributed crossover locations, with measurements taken within 30 minutes. Sentinel-1 SAR imagery supports the comparisons if available. Visual comparisons of SWOT and ICESat-2 with Sentinel-1 grey-scale values reveal clear coherence. However, small-scale surface features aren&amp;rsquo;t captured by SWOT as equally as by ICESat-2. The data shows absolute water level differences of about 5 cm, despite prior harmonisation of references and corrections. Differences of up to 50 cm can occur when comparing left- and right-hand SWOT swaths, mainly during winter and in areas with long sea ice coverage. This may be due to issues with the height correction from the crossover calibration. Quantitative point-by-point comparisons show mean standard deviations of about 8 cm for all surface types and 6 cm if restricted to ICESat-2-detected leads. Higher deviations are found during the early melting period between May and June, in the Canadian Archipelago and the Greenland Sea.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="18"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>