Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2914
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2914
27 Jun 2025
 | 27 Jun 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).

Quantifying farmed kelp atmospheric CO2 uptake through localized air-sea flux in the Northern Gulf of Alaska

Josianne Haag, Cale A. Miller, Jonah Jossart, and Amanda L. Kelley

Abstract. The rapid growth of mariculture in the United States, particularly in Alaska, has ignited interest in the co-benefit of using farmed kelp as a mitigation strategy against anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) released to the atmosphere. Here, we quantified the air-sea CO2 flux in three kelp farms across the Northern Gulf of Alaska with differing oceanographic conditions and farming practices to determine the carbon sequestration potential over the growing season. Sensors were deployed on two subsurface moorings placed in proximity of one another at each farm site: one "inside" and one "outside" as a control upstream of the farm. Both sensor arrays conducted hourly measurements of pH or CO2, temperature, salinity, and oxygen during the time from seed line outplanting in winter (November to January) to spring harvest (April or May) in 2024. Nominal differences in carbonate chemistry parameters were detected between the inside and outside moorings until March, when the frequency of variability remained consistent between moorings but their respective magnitude diverged. Notably, apparent oxygen production, seawater CO2 concentration, air-sea CO2 flux, and strength of periodic signals varied by farm site. Integrated over the entire deployment, two farms demonstrated net negative air-sea CO2 fluxes while one served as a net source of carbon: −84,397 mol m-2 in Jakolof Bay, −11,115 mol m-2 in Kalsin Bay, and 543 mol m-2 in Windy Bay. This study highlights the nuance of farmed kelp carbon capture by demonstrating that farm site can influence overall air-sea CO2 flux and that kelp farms are not always a net sink for atmospheric carbon.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Josianne Haag, Cale A. Miller, Jonah Jossart, and Amanda L. Kelley

Status: open (until 22 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Josianne Haag, Cale A. Miller, Jonah Jossart, and Amanda L. Kelley
Josianne Haag, Cale A. Miller, Jonah Jossart, and Amanda L. Kelley

Viewed

Total article views: 111 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
78 25 8 111 5 10
  • HTML: 78
  • PDF: 25
  • XML: 8
  • Total: 111
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 110 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 110 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
This study explores the growing interest in using farmed kelp as a method of marine carbon dioxide removal, focusing on three kelp farms spanning the Northern Gulf of Alaska. We measured net air-sea carbon dioxide exchange using sensors placed inside and outside each farm from winter to spring 2024. Two farms served as carbon sinks while one served as a source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Our findings highlight the importance of site selection in modulating local carbon capture.
Share