the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Baseflow in karst regions is significantly higher than the global average and exhibits spatial variability
Abstract. The distinct hydrogeological configurations of karst terrains engender fundamentally divergent baseflow regimes compared with non-karst systems. However, there is still some uncertainty in the understanding of baseflow in global karst regions due to the variability of methods and differences in natural conditions in different regions. In this study, runoff data from 1375 karst basins around the world were summarized, and graphical and digital filtering methods were used to estimate baseflow in global karst regions and to analyze their spatial differences and trends. The results show that the baseflow index of global karst areas is about 78±6.9 %, which is significantly higher than the global average baseflow index (60 %). The baseflow index of karst regions in different climatic zones also differed significantly, in which the average baseflow index of arid karst regions (82 %) was significantly higher than the average baseflow index of subtropical karst regions (77 %). Even within the same climate zone, the base flow index of different regions may also have significant differences, and the difference of some regions is even >10 %. For example, the difference in BFIs between northwestern North America and eastern North America near Hudson Bay, which are both temperate-climate karst zones, is more than 10 %. Vegetation factors reflected in primary productivity have the highest influence on baseflow in karst regions (15 %), while climatic factors (relative humidity, air temperature, etc.) have a lower influence on BFIs in karst regions (less than 5 %). From the time series trend, the global karst baseflow index shows an increasing trend, about 1.5 % from 1960 to 2015. These results help us to further understand karst hydrological processes and the response mechanism of karst hydrology under climate change.
- Preprint
(1704 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 16 Oct 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2843', Giacomo Medici, 07 Aug 2025
reply
General comments
Very good hydrological research of large impact. Please, follow my suggestions to improve the final version.
Specific comments
Lines 68-71. Insert new and recent literature for fissures and pipes in karstic dolostones and limestones:
- Medici, G., Munn, J.D., Parker, B.L. 2024. Delineating aquitard characteristics within a Silurian dolostone aquifer using high-density hydraulic head and fracture datasets. Hydrogeology Journal 32(6), 1663-1691.
- Giese, M., Reimann, T., Bailly‐Comte, V., Maréchal, J. C., Sauter, M., Geyer, T. 2018. Turbulent and laminar flow in karst conduits under unsteady flow conditions: Interpretation of pumping tests by discrete conduit‐continuum modeling. Water Resources Research, 54(3), 1918-1933.
Lines 112-113. More detail (e.g., possible ranges and maximum value etc etc) here or in the methodology on KGE and NSE coefficients.
Line 114. The aim is clear, but you need to specify the 3 to 4 specific objectives of your research by using numbers (e.g., i, ii, iii).
Line 193. Here you can insert the necessary methodological details for KGE and NSE coefficients.
Lines 495. Four points in the discussion. Maybe, four objectives to disclose in the introduction?
Figure and tables
Figure 1. Increase graphic resolution or make the figures larger.
Figure 4. Same here, increase graphic resolution or make the figures larger.
Figure 3. Make numbers and letters a bit larger.
Figure 7. I would provide more detail in the introduction on the definitions of the climate. What does it mean “temperate karst”. Semi-arid, humid?
Figure 8. Please, provide more detail on the description of the results for the (i) R2, (ii) NSE and (iii) KGE values which look good. R2 maybe a bit low, but this is ok.
Figure 9. Move Figure 9c below and make the figure larger.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2843-CC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Qiuwen Zhou, 08 Aug 2025
reply
Thank you for your valuable comments and revision suggestions on this article. We have provided responses and explanations to the suggestions you put forward, and have compiled them into a PDF file.
-
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Qiuwen Zhou, 08 Aug 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
525 | 47 | 12 | 584 | 10 | 21 |
- HTML: 525
- PDF: 47
- XML: 12
- Total: 584
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1