Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2626
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2626
03 Jul 2025
 | 03 Jul 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

The influence of irradiance and interspecific differences on δ11B, δ13C and elemental ratios in four coralline algae complexes

Maxence Guillermic, Erik C. Krieger, Joyce Goh, Christopher E. Cornwall, and Robert A. Eagle

Abstract. Coralline algae are a cosmopolitan group of important foundational species. The calcium carbonate they produce is increasingly being investigated as paleoenvironmental archives, as well as used to trace physiological responses of these important macroalgae to environmental change. Here we address the impact of light (irradiance) on 4 species complexes of coralline red algae including two morphologies; geniculate (branching) and non-geniculate (encrusting). The four complexes up-regulated their δ11B derived pHCF relative to seawater by 0.6 to 0.8 pH unit. δ11B was not measurably affected by varing irradiance despite evidence of increasing photosynthesis constrained by measurements of photophysiological parameters and δ13Cmineral. All complexes were able to maintain and elevate their pHCF relative to seawater for all treatments. Non-geniculate and geniculate complexes had distinct geochemical signatures of δ11B, δ13Cmineral and trace elements. These differences in geochemical signatures indicate a variety of calcification mechanisms exist within coralline algae.

We propose that different sources of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) are necessary to explain the observed δ13Cmineral. As geniculate species have higher photosynthetic activity (i.e. gross photosynthesis), the DIC sources allocated to calcification might be limited due to greater CO2 drawdown. This is supported by B/Ca and U/Ca ratios suggesting modulation of carbonate chemistry and especially lower DICCF in geniculate relative to non-geniculate complexes. DIC sources might come from direct CO2 diffusion or better recycling of metabolic CO2 which would explain the depleted δ13Cmineral. This strategy likely arises from the different energy needs of the organisms, with non-geniculate using relatively more energy to support calcification. We suggest the different calcification mechanisms between morphologies are linked to distinct photosynthetic activity strategies. While photosynthesis can provide energy to geniculate complexes to maintain their metabolic needs, their calcification may be limited by DIC. In contrast, non-geniculate forms, may benefit from more limited DIC drawdown due to lower photosynthetic activity, therefore maintaining higher internal DIC concentrations ultimately supporting faster calcification.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Maxence Guillermic, Erik C. Krieger, Joyce Goh, Christopher E. Cornwall, and Robert A. Eagle

Status: open (until 14 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Maxence Guillermic, Erik C. Krieger, Joyce Goh, Christopher E. Cornwall, and Robert A. Eagle
Maxence Guillermic, Erik C. Krieger, Joyce Goh, Christopher E. Cornwall, and Robert A. Eagle

Viewed

Total article views: 78 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
59 11 8 78 6 4 6
  • HTML: 59
  • PDF: 11
  • XML: 8
  • Total: 78
  • Supplement: 6
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 77 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 77 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
We address the impact of light on four complexes of coralline red algae using boron and carbon isotopic signatures. We show that the four complexes up-regulated their δ11B derived pHCF relative to seawater by 0.6 to 0.8 pH unit but pHCF was not directly impacted by light at the complex level. The differences in calcification between encrusting and branching complexes result from different photosynthetic regimes and carbon concentrating mechanisms, which would be inherent to morphologies.
Share