Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-252
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-252
18 Mar 2025
 | 18 Mar 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Ensemble Random Forest for Tropical Cyclone Tracking

Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Stella Bourdin, Davide Faranda, and Mathieu Vrac

Abstract. Even though tropical cyclones (TCs) are well documented during the intense part of their lifecycle until they start to evanesce, many physical and statistical properties governing them are not well captured by gridded reanalysis or simulated by earth system models. Thus, the tracking of TCs remains a matter of interest for the investigation of observed and simulated tropical cyclones. Two types of cyclone tracking schemes are available. On the one hand, there are trackers that rely on physical and dynamical properties of the TCs and user-prescribed thresholds, which make them rigid. They need numerous variables that are not always available in the models. On the other hand, there are trackers leaning on deep learning which, by nature, need large amounts of data and computing power. Besides, given the number of physical variables needed for the tracking, they can be prone to overfitting, which hinders their transferability to climate models. In this study, the ability of a Random Forest (RF) approach to track TCs with a limited number of aggregated variables is explored. Hence, the tracking is considered as a binary supervised classification problem of TC-free (zero) and TC (one) situations. Our analysis focuses on the Eastern North Pacific and North Atlantic basins, for which, respectively, 514 and 431 observed tropical cyclone track records are available from the IBTrACS database during the 1980–2021 period. For each 6-hourly time step, RF associates TC occurrence or absence (1 or 0) to atmospheric situations described by predictors extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis. Then situations with TC occurrences are joined for reconstructing TC trajectories. Results show the ability and performance of this method for tracking tropical cyclones over both basins, and good temporal and spatial generalization as well. RF has a similar TC detection rate as trackers based on TCs' properties and significantly lower false alarm rate. RF allows us to detect TC situations for a range of predictor combinations, which brings more flexibility than threshold based trackers. Last but not least, this study shed light on the most relevant variables allowing to detect tropical cyclone.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Stella Bourdin, Davide Faranda, and Mathieu Vrac

Status: open (until 21 May 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Stella Bourdin, Davide Faranda, and Mathieu Vrac
Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Stella Bourdin, Davide Faranda, and Mathieu Vrac

Viewed

Total article views: 108 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
82 22 4 108 12 6 4
  • HTML: 82
  • PDF: 22
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 108
  • Supplement: 12
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 116 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 116 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
The tracking of Tropical cyclones (TCs) remains a matter of interest for the investigation of observed and simulated tropical cyclones. In this study, Random Forest (RF), a machine learning approach, is considered to track TCs. RF associates TC occurrence or absence to different atmospheric configurations. Compared to trackers found in the literature, it shows similar performance for tracking TCs, better control over false alarm, more flexibility and reveal key variables allowing to detect TCs.
Share