the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Environmental drivers constraining the seasonal variability of satellite-observed methane at Northern high latitudes
Abstract. Methane emissions from Northern high-latitude wetlands are associated with large uncertainties, especially in the rapidly warming climate. Satellite observations of column-averaged methane concentrations (XCH4) in the atmosphere exhibit variability due to time-varying sources and sinks. In this study, we investigate how environmental variables, such as temperature, soil moisture, snow cover, and the hydroxyl radical (OH) sink of methane, explain the seasonal variability of column-averaged methane concentrations (XCH4) observed from space over Northern high-latitude wetland areas. We use XCH4 data obtained from the TROPOMI instrument aboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite, retrieved using the Weighting Function Modified Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFMD) algorithm. Environmental variables are derived primarily from meteorological reanalysis datasets, with satellite-based data used for snow cover and soil freeze-thaw dynamics, and modeled data for the OH sink. Our analysis focuses on five case study regions, including two in Finland and three in Russian Siberia, covering the period from 2018 to 2023. Our findings reveal that environmental variables have a systematic impact on XCH4 variability: the seasonal variability is most strongly influenced by snow cover and soil water volume, while daily variability is primarily affected by soil temperature. Our results are largely consistent with in-situ-based local studies but the role of snow is more pronounced. Our results demonstrate how satellite XCH4 observations can be used to study the seasonal variability of atmospheric methane over large wetland regions. The results imply that satellite observations of atmospheric composition, along with other Earth Observations as well as meteorological reanalysis data can be jointly informative of the processes controlling the emissions in Northern high latitudes.
- Preprint
(8228 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 28 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-249', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Mar 2025
reply
This study investigates how environmental variables influence the seasonal variability of methane (CH₄) at high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, utilizing satellite observations from TROPOMI along with meteorological datasets. The research provides a valuable contribution to understanding CH₄ variability, identifying key drivers such as snow cover, soil moisture, and soil temperature. Only minor revisions are recommended to enhance the clarity, interpretability, and completeness of the manuscript.
- Lines 190-195:How to determine the study area by testing? Can you explain it in detail?
- Lines 325-330: Did you validate the Random Forest model using cross-validation techniques (e.g., k-fold validation)? If so, how consistent were the importance rankings across different training-test splits?
- Lines 345-350: Since multiple environmental variables (e.g., snow cover and soil freeze-thaw state) exhibit high correlations (r > 0.85), how do you ensure that feature importance rankings are not biased by collinearity in the Random Forest model?
- Lines 415-420: Have you considered the contribution of atmospheric transport processes to the observed seasonal variability of methane concentrations, particularly the potential influence from emission sources located outside your study regions?
- Lines 450-455: Soil moisture is identified as a key driver of seasonal CH₄ However, why does it not have the same level of importance in daily variations? Could transient factors like precipitation events or drainage explain this discrepancy?
- Lines 490-495: The ranking of OH as a CH₄ sink varies between the two feature importance methods (Permutation Importance and RFFI). Why do these differences arise?
- Lines 580-585: Does the observation that seasonal CH₄ maxima and minima closely align with the timing of complete snowmelt imply that snow cover primarily controls the seasonal variability through its effects on soil temperature and moisture? Could you further discuss this controlling mechanism?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-249-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
170 | 43 | 5 | 218 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 170
- PDF: 43
- XML: 5
- Total: 218
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 54 | 27 |
Finland | 2 | 45 | 22 |
India | 3 | 16 | 8 |
China | 4 | 15 | 7 |
Germany | 5 | 14 | 7 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 54