the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Equatorial wave circulation associated with subseasonal convective variability over the subtropical western North Pacific in boreal summer
Abstract. Atmospheric convection over the subtropical western North Pacific (SWNP) during boreal summer varies with a lifespan around 10 days, with significant effects on both local and remote circulation. Among the less understood effects is the coupling between SWNP convection variability and variability in equatorial wave circulation. This paper quantifies equatorial wave perturbations and their evolution throughout the SWNP convection lifespan, using wave space regression between outgoing longwave radiation over the SWNP region and spectral expansion coefficients of global tropospheric circulation from ERA5 reanalyses. The regression distinguishes between convection-coupled Rossby and Kelvin waves, and mixed Rossby-gravity (MRG) and inertia-gravity (IG) waves. The former two correspond to the Gill solution of tropical wave response to asymmetric heating. The results show that MRG and IG waves exhibit amplitudes comparable to those of the Gill response component in the upper troposphere. In particular, MRG and IG waves dominate the cross-equatorial northerly flow over the Maritime Continent, with MRG waves being more important. These findings suggest caution in applying the Gill solution to interpret circulation responses to asymmetric heating sources in model simulations.
As SWNP convection intensifies, the MRG wave northerly winds across the equator strengthen, while IG waves represent enhanced upper-tropospheric outflow over the SWNP region. By contrast, the combined effect of Kelvin and Rossby waves reinforces circulation on the equatorward flank of the anticyclone over the SWNP region, with Rossby wave easterlies being about three times stronger than those associated with Kelvin waves. The Rossby wave signal resembles the n = 1 Rossby wave, with its Southern Hemisphere (SH) subtropical anticyclonic gyre forming over the southern Indian ocean during the decay phase of the SWNP convection. This subtropical Rossby wave gyre, combined with the IG meridional flow in the SH, acts as a bridge between the SWNP convection and extratropical circulation during austral winter.
- Preprint
(4595 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1758 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2485', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Aug 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2485/egusphere-2025-2485-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-2485-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peishan Chen, 25 Aug 2025
Thank you very much for your comments. The detailed responses to your comments will be addressed.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2485-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peishan Chen, 25 Aug 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2485', Breno Raphaldini, 24 Sep 2025
Review of “Equatorial wave circulation associated with subseasonal convective variability over the subtropical western North Pacific in boreal summer”
This is an interesting article about subtropical western North Pacific (SWNP) atmospheric convection in terms of wave activity and its coupling with convection. In particular, the roles of Rossby, Kelvin, MRG and IG modes are computed through normal mode decomposition techniques and highlights the roles of IG and MRG waves that are not present in Gill’s original theoretical framework. The paper is generally well written and the scientific problem is clearly stated and deserves publication after a minor review. Particularly I would like to see more discussion on the relevant zonal wave numbers for SWNP convection for each mode type.
Minor issues.
lines 137-138: I did not understand the meaning of the phrase “This means that the sum of Rossby, Kelvin, MRG, WIG and EIG modes in physical space corresponds to the inverse of the complete χν signal.”,
line 160: If I understand correctly formula (1) was not used in figure 1, how “horizontal wind anomalies at 150 hPa and 850 hPa in the tropics associated with OLR variability” is defined?
I understand that figure 1 can be constructed from formula 1 by inverting it in physical space, but how was the figure originally constructed?
Line 200: Wouldn’t this result also depend on the dominant zonal wavenumber of the Rossby and Kelvin waves (as large k components will average out close to zero and small k’s with wavelengths larger than the box will have averages different from zero)? Do you have that information?
Figures 8 and 9: I was wondering if it is possible to summarize the finding of these two figures in a single figure showing some time series as a function of the lags? For instance the integrated values of |u(t)|^2 and |v(t)|^2 for the zonal and meridional velocities of each type of mode.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Peishan Chen, 25 Sep 2025
Thank you very much for your comments. We are going to address these comments and revise the paper.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2485-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Peishan Chen, 25 Sep 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
810 | 51 | 21 | 882 | 29 | 33 | 41 |
- HTML: 810
- PDF: 51
- XML: 21
- Total: 882
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 41
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1