the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Enhanced Baseflow Separation in Rural Catchments: Event-Specific Calibration of Recursive Digital Filters with Tracer-Derived Data
Abstract. This study investigates the performance of baseflow separation methods in a small rural catchment, emphasizing the calibration of three Recursive Digital Filters (RDFs): Eckhardt, Lyne and Hollick (LH), and Chapman and Maxwell (CM). By integrating dissolved silica concentration as a reference tracer, the study refines the parameterization of BFImax in the Eckhardt’s filter and Beta in the LH filter. An innovative event-specific calibration methodology was applied, where rainfall events were categorized by intensity to tailor filter parameters accordingly. Results indicate that the Eckhardt’s filter, when calibrated dynamically per event magnitude, yields the most accurate baseflow estimates, closely aligning with observed data. The event-based calibration significantly enhanced accuracy, particularly for the Eckhardt’s and LH filters, compared to a general calibration method. The CM filter, despite generating reasonable hydrograph shapes, consistently underestimated baseflow due to its fixed parameters. These findings highlight the necessity of customized calibration strategies for improved baseflow separation and underscore the superior performance of the Eckhardt’s filter when integrated with event-specific calibrations. This research offers practical insights for hydrologists aiming to optimize baseflow modeling in rural catchments, contributing to improved water resource management and conservation.
- Preprint
(1411 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 07 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-244', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Apr 2025
reply
General Comments:
This manuscript presents a well-executed and innovative study on baseflow separation in small rural catchments, focusing on the calibration of three Recursive Digital Filters (Eckhardt, Lyne and Hollick, and Chapman and Maxwell). The integration of dissolved silica as a tracer and the event-specific calibration approach are both novel and valuable contributions to the field.The writing is clear, and engaging, making the technical content accessible and enjoyable to read. The study’s methodology is robust, and the results convincingly demonstrate the advantages of dynamic, event-based calibration-particularly for the Eckhardt filter, which outperforms the others in accuracy when parameters are tailored to rainfall event intensity.
Specific Comments:
While the manuscript is strong overall, there are areas where it could be further improved. The authors provide a thorough explanation of performance metrics such as NSE and RMSE, but this level of detail may be unnecessary for the target audience, who are likely already familiar with these standard evaluation tools. Streamlining these sections would help maintain the manuscript’s focus and momentum. The presentation of results relies heavily on numerical values in the text. Incorporating more plots and figures would greatly enhance the reader’s ability to interpret and appreciate the findings.This is a timely contribution with clear novelty in its event-specific calibration strategy and use of chemical tracers. The manuscript is exceptionally well-written and methodologically sound. To maximize its impact, I recommend reducing the over-explanation of standard metrics and enhancing the presentation of results with more visual aids. These improvements would make the findings even more accessible and persuasive to a broad hydrology audience.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Fernanda Helfer, 29 Apr 2025
reply
We thank the reviewer for their constructive feedback.
Regarding the explanation of standard performance metrics (e.g., NSE and RMSE): We acknowledge the point that the target audience is likely familiar with these metrics. So, to streamline the manuscript and maintain its momentum, we will condense the descriptions of NSE, RMSE, and related metrics, with the focus shifting to their interpretation within the context of our event-specific calibration strategy.
Regarding the reliance on numerical values in the results section: We agree that more visual aids would enhance clarity and reader engagement. We will revise the results section (section 3) to incorporate additional figures. Specifically, we will convert Tables 9 and 10 into comparative plots.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-244-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Fernanda Helfer, 29 Apr 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
71 | 18 | 5 | 94 | 7 | 6 |
- HTML: 71
- PDF: 18
- XML: 5
- Total: 94
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1