Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2376
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2376
23 Jun 2025
 | 23 Jun 2025

Mitigating impacts of low energy laser pulses on CALIOP data products

Jason L. Tackett, Robert A. Ryan, Anne E. Garnier, Jayanta Kar, Brian J. Getzewich, Xia Cai, Mark A. Vaughan, Charles R. Trepte, Ron C. Verhappen, David M. Winker, and Kam-Pui A. Lee

Abstract. The spaceborne Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) experienced an increasing number of intermittent low energy laser pulses in the final 7 years of the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Observations (CALIPSO) mission due to coronal arcing within the laser canister as internal pressure levels decreased. Degraded data quality was initially observed primarily over the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) region, with impacts eventually spreading globally at lower rates. To preserve the integrity of the CALIOP data record, a suite of low energy mitigation (LEM) procedures was developed to reject data that is substantially impacted by low energy pulses on small, targeted scales to minimize data loss. LEM corrects level 1B calibration biases of −3 to −4 % and reduces calibration uncertainties by 20–40 % at SAA-latitudes (0–50°S) for the 532 nm daytime and 1064 nm channels. LEM rejection in level 2 processing substantially reduces the occurrence of false feature detections. Horizontally averaged data segments that are LEM-affected (i.e., some low energy shots are present, but LEM determines the filtered profile is still acceptable) experience a signal-to-noise ratio reduction of 6–9 % which increases the probability of false detections, though this is mitigated somewhat by a slight increase in feature detection thresholds. Features identified in LEM-affected data are similar to unaffected features in terms of measured layer-averaged properties that are important for classification and subtyping. Overall, this evidence suggests that LEM has eliminated the major impacts of low energy pulses on data quality. LEM procedures were implemented in the version 4.51 level 1B data release and are implemented in all data levels of the final version 5 CALIOP data release.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jason L. Tackett, Robert A. Ryan, Anne E. Garnier, Jayanta Kar, Brian J. Getzewich, Xia Cai, Mark A. Vaughan, Charles R. Trepte, Ron C. Verhappen, David M. Winker, and Kam-Pui A. Lee

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2376', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 Sep 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2376', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Sep 2025
Jason L. Tackett, Robert A. Ryan, Anne E. Garnier, Jayanta Kar, Brian J. Getzewich, Xia Cai, Mark A. Vaughan, Charles R. Trepte, Ron C. Verhappen, David M. Winker, and Kam-Pui A. Lee
Jason L. Tackett, Robert A. Ryan, Anne E. Garnier, Jayanta Kar, Brian J. Getzewich, Xia Cai, Mark A. Vaughan, Charles R. Trepte, Ron C. Verhappen, David M. Winker, and Kam-Pui A. Lee

Viewed

Total article views: 410 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
353 47 10 410 47 10 14
  • HTML: 353
  • PDF: 47
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 410
  • Supplement: 47
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 409 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 409 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
The spaceborne atmospheric lidar CALIOP experienced an increasing number of intermittent low energy laser pulses in the final seven years of the 17-year long CALIPSO mission. Low energy pulses degraded the quality of retrievals in affected profiles. This paper describes low energy mitigation (LEM) algorithms that remove affected data and minimize data loss. LEM is demonstrated to correct calibration biases, reduce false feature detections, and restore the integrity of the CALIOP data record.
Share