Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2276
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2276
04 Jul 2025
 | 04 Jul 2025

GEMS ozone profile retrieval: impact and validation of version 3.0 improvements

Juseon Bak, Arno Keppens, Daesung Choi, Sungjae Hong, Jae-Hwan Kim, Cheol-Hee Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Wonbae Jeon, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Joowan Kim, Kanghyun Beak, Kai Yang, Xiong Liu, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Yeonjin Jung, Hyunkee Hong, and Won-Jin Lee

Abstract. This study presents the first comprehensive description of the operational GEMS (Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer) ozone profile retrieval algorithm and evaluates the performance of the recently reprocessed version 3.0 dataset. The retrieval operates in the 310–330 nm spectral range and yields total degrees of freedom for ozone ranging from 1.5 to 3. Although the vertical sensitivity is limited, GEMS achieves an effective vertical resolution of 5–10 km and is capable of separating tropospheric and stratospheric ozone layers. This work primarily highlights the substantial algorithmic and calibration enhancements introduced in version 3.0 over the previous version, including improvements to the slit function, wavelength calibration, and radiometric calibration. In particular, the irradiance offset has been a major issue affecting the accuracy of ozone profile and other Level 2 products. To address this, the measured irradiance is scaled relative to a high-resolution solar reference spectrum using a correction factor. Residual wavelength-dependent biases in the normalized radiance are further addressed through soft calibration. As a result, version 3.0 significantly reduces spectral fitting residuals, lowering them from 0.8 % in version 2.0 to 0.2 % under nominal conditions. This improvement also mitigates the altitude-dependent oscillating biases observed in the previous version, which included up to 40 DU overestimation in the troposphere and 20 DU underestimation in the stratosphere, when compared with ozonesonde observations. The version 3 ozone profiles show agreement within 10 DU of ozonesonde profiles, with a mean bias of −7.7 % in tropospheric ozone columns and within 5 % in the stratosphere. Furthermore, the retrievals capture day-to-day vertical ozone variability, as demonstrated by comparisons with daily ozonesonde launches in February and March 2024. Integrated ozone columns derived from the profiles also show improved consistency with ground-based total ozone measurements, yielding a mean bias of −3.6 DU and outperforming the GEMS operational total column ozone product.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

06 Jan 2026
GEMS ozone profile retrieval: impact and validation of version 3.0 improvements
Juseon Bak, Arno Keppens, Daesung Choi, Sungjae Hong, Jae-Hwan Kim, Cheol-Hee Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Wonbae Jeon, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Joowan Kim, Kanghyun Baek, Kai Yang, Xiong Liu, Gonzalo González Abad, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Yeonjin Jung, Hyunkee Hong, and Won-Jin Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 119–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-119-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-119-2026, 2026
Short summary
Juseon Bak, Arno Keppens, Daesung Choi, Sungjae Hong, Jae-Hwan Kim, Cheol-Hee Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Wonbae Jeon, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Joowan Kim, Kanghyun Beak, Kai Yang, Xiong Liu, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Yeonjin Jung, Hyunkee Hong, and Won-Jin Lee

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2276', Serena Di Pede, 25 Jul 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Juseon Bak, 05 Aug 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2276 preprint', Glen Jaross, 19 Aug 2025

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2276', Serena Di Pede, 25 Jul 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Juseon Bak, 05 Aug 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2276 preprint', Glen Jaross, 19 Aug 2025

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Juseon Bak on behalf of the Authors (20 Aug 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (02 Sep 2025) by Mark Weber
RR by Glen Jaross (02 Sep 2025)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (03 Sep 2025) by Mark Weber
AR by Juseon Bak on behalf of the Authors (03 Sep 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (18 Sep 2025) by Mark Weber
AR by Juseon Bak on behalf of the Authors (18 Sep 2025)  Manuscript 

Post-review adjustments

AA – Author's adjustment | EA – Editor approval
AA by Juseon Bak on behalf of the Authors (18 Dec 2025)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (18 Dec 2025) by Mark Weber
AA by Juseon Bak on behalf of the Authors (18 Dec 2025)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (18 Dec 2025) by Mark Weber

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

06 Jan 2026
GEMS ozone profile retrieval: impact and validation of version 3.0 improvements
Juseon Bak, Arno Keppens, Daesung Choi, Sungjae Hong, Jae-Hwan Kim, Cheol-Hee Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Wonbae Jeon, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Joowan Kim, Kanghyun Baek, Kai Yang, Xiong Liu, Gonzalo González Abad, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Yeonjin Jung, Hyunkee Hong, and Won-Jin Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 119–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-119-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-119-2026, 2026
Short summary
Juseon Bak, Arno Keppens, Daesung Choi, Sungjae Hong, Jae-Hwan Kim, Cheol-Hee Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Wonbae Jeon, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Joowan Kim, Kanghyun Beak, Kai Yang, Xiong Liu, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Yeonjin Jung, Hyunkee Hong, and Won-Jin Lee
Juseon Bak, Arno Keppens, Daesung Choi, Sungjae Hong, Jae-Hwan Kim, Cheol-Hee Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Wonbae Jeon, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Joowan Kim, Kanghyun Beak, Kai Yang, Xiong Liu, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Yeonjin Jung, Hyunkee Hong, and Won-Jin Lee

Viewed

Total article views: 1,089 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
915 139 35 1,089 66 29 42
  • HTML: 915
  • PDF: 139
  • XML: 35
  • Total: 1,089
  • Supplement: 66
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,076 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,076 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Jan 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
This study presents the first complete description of the operational version 3 ozone profile retrieval algorithm for the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) and its performance characteristics. Improvements in radiometric and wavelength calibration reduce spectral fitting uncertainties and enhance agreement with ozonesonde profiles and Pandora total ozone measurements.
Share