the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Carbon Mapper emissions monitoring system
Abstract. The non-profit organization Carbon Mapper has a public good mission to drive greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions by making methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) data accessible and actionable. The Carbon Mapper emissions monitoring system contributes to the broader ecosystem of greenhouse gas observations by locating and quantifying CH4 and CO2 super emitters at facility scale across priority regions globally. To meet these objectives, our system includes observing platforms, an operational monitoring strategy optimized for mitigation impact, and a data platform that delivers CH4 and CO2 data products for diverse stakeholders. Operational scale-up of our system is centered around a new constellation of hyperspectral satellites enabled by over a decade of sustained instrument technology and algorithm advances and prototyping with aircraft surveys and recent observations by NASA’s EMIT instrument on the International Space Station. The Carbon Mapper Coalition (hereafter Tanager) satellites are each equipped with an imaging spectrometer instrument designed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory that are assembled, launched and operated by Planet Labs. The first Tanager satellite (Tanager-1) was launched 16 August 2024, completed commissioning in January 2025, and is on track for full operational monitoring by summer 2025. Planet is currently working to expand the constellation to four Tanagers. The system is designed to balance detection limits, spatial coverage and sample frequency to optimize observational completeness for high emission CH4 and CO2 point sources. Each imaging spectrometer instrument has a spectral range of about 400–2500 nm, 5 nm spectral sampling, a nadir spatial resolution of 30 meters, and nadir swath width of about 19 km. Each satellite is capable of imaging up to 300,000 km2 per day. By combining the results of independent controlled release testing with empirical evaluation of the radiometric, spectral, spatial performance, and retrieval noise performance of the Tanager-1 spectrometer, we predict minimum detection limits of about 66 – 144 kgCH4/h for CH4 point sources and about 10,400 – 19,600 kgCO2/h for CO2 point sources for images with 25 % albedo, 45 degree solar zenith angle, and 3 m/s wind speed. Detection limit varies with imaging mode and environmental variables. Every Tanager satellite provides multiple imaging modes with varying degrees of ground motion compensation that allow trade-offs between detection limit and spatio-temporal coverage. The Carbon Mapper monitoring strategy focuses on routine mapping of major CH4 and CO2 emitting regions and priority facilities around the world. With a single Tanager satellite, the cloud-free median time to access ranges from 2 to 5 days for isolated areas of interest (AOIs) at mid-latitudes. With four Tanager satellites, the cloud-free median time to access is reduced to under 10 hours for isolated AOIs, with weekly to monthly sample frequency for comprehensive mapping of contiguous regions. The constellation is designed for scale-up by launching more satellites with an ultimate goal of providing routine sub-daily monitoring of all high priority regions and 90 % observing system completeness for point sources. Additionally, the satellites are capable of sun-glint tracking over the ocean to allow monitoring of offshore oil and gas fields, a key emission sector that has largely gone unmonitored. A review of the first 7 months of Tanager-1 CH4 and CO2 observations including initial validation with coordinated aircraft under-flights and non-blind controlled release testing indicates that the system is meeting performance requirements and, in many cases, surpassing expectations. We also present early observational findings including the first use of Tanager data to guide the timely mitigation of a CH4 super emitter.
- Preprint
(13115 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2275', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Jul 2025
The attached supplementary pdf file contains the comments.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Riley Duren, 07 Sep 2025
We thank the referee for their helpful comments. We have implemented most of the recommended edits. To address concerns about the manuscript’s length and readability, we have reduced the scope of the paper to a first assessment of Tanager-1 performance and moved some detailed supporting text and figures to a Supplemental Information appendix. The sections on observing system completeness and predicted spatio-temporal coverage of the Tanager constellation were removed and will be covered in greater depth in a subsequent manuscript.
Additional specific responses are summarized in the attached file.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Riley Duren, 07 Sep 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2275', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Aug 2025
The manuscript by Duren et al. describes the Carbon Mapper satellite-based system for the detection and quantification of greenhouse gas emission point sources. This is an exciting development in the quickly evolving field of methane and CO2 remote sensing, to which Carbon Mapper will soon become a key contributor. This is confirmed by the mission performance results reported in this document (the plume maps in Figs. 14, 15 or 18 are particularly impressive). The manuscript is a perfect fit for AMT and I recommend its publication in general.
On the other hand, the overall presentation of the manuscript suffers from poor formatting, lack of clarity, and minimal attention to structure and detail in my opinion. The manuscript gives the impression that the authors were not fully invested in preparing a submission of suitable quality for peer-reviewed publication, and I don’t think that the manuscript has been proof-read before submission. From my point of view, significant revision is required to bring the manuscript to a level where its scientific contributions can be properly assessed and appreciated.
Here is a list of the parts of the manuscript where I think improvements are needed:
- Abstract: it is very long, and reads more as an executive summary of an internal mission report than as an abstract of a scientific pubilication. I would propose to shorten it substantially, especially in the parts not directly related to findings of this study.
- Sec. 1.1: these paragraphs provide a review of past and current missions with sensitivity to methane and CO2. However, the part of this section referring to “point source images” is strongly biased towards the instruments and work by the authors. It is striking (and a bit annoying) not to find a single reference to the GHGSat program, which is very similar to Carbon Mapper in terms of observational requirements and capabilities (with a superior performance for GHGSat currently because of their higher number of operating satellites). It is also surprising not to find references to the retrieval and analysis work that has been done (mostly by groups in Europe and China) with other space-based imaging spectrometers, including EnMAP, PRISMA and the AHSI onboard the GF and ZY1 satellites, which are also very similar to the Tanager instruments. I would strongly request the authors to better reflect the international context in their study.
- Sec. 2: it is also very lengthy: In my opinion, the first two paragraphs read as a new introduction section, sec 2.1.2 does not add meaningful content, L388-397 are redundant with previous contents, and L399-419, L470-480 and L620-655 provide much more detail on the instrument design than what is actually needed to understand Tanager’s potential for GHG retrievals. I believe that the whole section would benefit from shortening and focusing on the mission and instrument parameters directly affect
- Sec. 2.5.3: please explain how uncertainties in emission rates are estimated
- Sec. 4.1, MDL: does this MDL analysis only refer to one pixel standing out from the background XCH4 values, as I seem to interpret from Eq. 7? I don’t think that you would claim a plume detection if this is only based on a 1-pixel enhancement, but you would need several connected pixels with an enhancement n-times higher than the noise level. Is this correct? If so, I don’t this metric can be used as an absolute measure of detection limit, as I think you are doing within this section.
Other minor comments:
- L151 “of CH4”
- L343 “types. And”
- Table 1, I miss the GSD parameter
- Figs.3 and 4: they should have a more similar format. Also, axis labels are missing in Fig.4.
- L656 FPA has been defined ealier in the text
- L778 and L785: two consecutive definitions of QC
- L895 TOA has been defined ealier in the text
- L978 “Condo”?
- L1010-1016: As the authors know, super-emissions in the Permian basin are typically short-lived. I don’t think that the 7 t/h source would have been active 15 days after the initial Tanager detection even if it had not been notified.
- Fig. 20, 21: ppm·m units should be used for consistency with the other figures and XCH4 maps
- L1210: “for an isolated of interest”
- Fig. 25, 26: they should have the same y-axis label; also, please, discuss the TTA peaks in the text.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2275-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Riley Duren, 07 Sep 2025
We thank the referee for their helpful comments. We have implemented most of the recommended edits. To address concerns about the manuscript’s length and readability, we have reduced the scope of the paper to a first assessment of Tanager-1 performance and moved some detailed supporting text and figures to a Supplemental Information appendix. The sections on observing system completeness and predicted spatio-temporal coverage of the Tanager constellation were removed and will be covered in greater depth in a subsequent manuscript.
Additional specific responses are summarized in the attached file.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Riley Duren, 07 Sep 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
995 | 361 | 21 | 1,377 | 12 | 26 |
- HTML: 995
- PDF: 361
- XML: 21
- Total: 1,377
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1