the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Cross-Hemispheric Transport of the Hunga Aerosol Plume: In Situ Evidence and Radiative Effects from the Northern Hemisphere
Abstract. The Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai eruption (20° S) in January 2022 injected a substantial amount of water vapor and aerosols into the stratosphere, primarily impacting the Southern Hemisphere and tropics. Using a combination of satellite observations and in situ measurements with optical particle counters, we show that a significant portion of the aerosol plume was transported into the Northern Hemisphere (NH) mid-latitudes. This cross-hemispheric transport occurred within the tropically controlled transition zone, within the shallow branch of the Brewer–Dobson circulation. By October 2022, enhanced aerosol concentrations were observed up to 50° N, at altitudes between 17–23 km with some dense plumes at around 21–22 km. In situ observations reveal an effective radius of around 330 nm, comparable to what was observed in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). Aerosol extinction coefficients in the mid-latitudes (30–50° N) increased by ∼50 % over background levels, corresponding to an aerosol optical depth (AOD) increase of (1–2) × 10−3. These enhancements led to a modest, but not negligible, shortwave top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative forcing of −0.05 ± 0.01 W m−2 between October 2022 and April 2023. Our results show that the moderate aerosol impact of the Hunga eruption in the SH produced non-negligible radiative impacts in the NH, emphasizing the importance of considering both hemispheres when analysing the total impact.
- Preprint
(12883 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Sep 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2091', Yun He, 28 Jul 2025
reply
Thank you very much for authors' work regarding the cross-hemispheric transport of the Hunga aerosol plume. Please find some supplement informations in the uploaded file.
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2091', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Aug 2025
reply
This manuscript of 'Cross-Hemispheric Transport of the Hunga Aerosol Plume: In Situ Evidence and Radiative Effects from the Northern Hemisphere' by Kloss et al. investigated the cross-hemispheric transport and the impact of the southern hemispheric Hunga eruption on the northern hemisphere mid-latitudes, which is a meaningful supplement to previous studies primarily concerning the southern hemisphere and tropics. In this study, both satellite observations and in situ measurements with OPCs were used to analyze the significant aerosol plumes transported into the NH mid-latitudes and their transport pathway. Balloon borne OPCs observations revealed the total bimodal distribution and an effective radius of ~ 330 nm within the aerosol plume layer. Based on analysis of aerosol extinction coefficients from SAGE III/ISS, the Hunga eruption was estimated to have a shortwave top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative forcing of −0.05±0.01W m−2 during October 2022 to April 2023. These results underscored that even a volcanic eruption with moderate aerosol output can have measurable effects in the opposite hemisphere.
Some minor issues:
Line 76: 2.5 mm --> 3.0 mm
Line 140: It should be noted at which levels no background aerosol conditions are observed.
Figure 1: I maybe miss the time interval for this figure, daily or twice daily?
Figure 1: It speaks twice of vertical dashed line.
Figure 1: It's seen that the most enhanced signals are located at the levels of mean tropopause height, but obviously these signals are not from volcano eruption, probably from cirrus in the upper tropopause at the lower latitude. Therefore, my suggestion is to use the highest tropopause instead of the mean tropopause at the latitude range, in this way, all the enhanced signals will be below the tropopause.
Line 144-150: Could you draw the outline of the plumes from Hunga eruption in Figure 1? It's not easy to get what you said.
Line 152: Could you show us the exact values of aerosol extinction from these two eruptions? It's not easy to see a factor of around 1.5.
Figure 2: It's not easy to tell the difference among different profiles. Could you plot the figures above 15 km, below which is not used?
Figure 3: This figure shows the trajectories originated from 20.6 km. How about the lower levels, such as 16-18 km also with volcanic eruption plumes, where the flow should be different?
Figure 4: Could you check the tropopause height in the figures, particularly in Fig. 4a, which changes too rapid?
Figure 5:What's the time interval for this figure?
Figure 6: Could you draw the outline of the plumes from Hunga eruption in Figure 6? It's not easy to get what you said.
Line 276: 676 nm --> 756 nm.
Line 281: Why use the size distributions obtained with satellite observations, not use those from POPS measurements?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2091-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
245 | 34 | 10 | 289 | 4 | 7 |
- HTML: 245
- PDF: 34
- XML: 10
- Total: 289
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1