the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Fresh tephra deposits from the Tajogaite Volcano boost thermophile proliferation and soil organic matter recovery
Abstract. Tephra fallout deposition during volcanic eruptions overlays existing soils, profoundly altering their physical, chemical, and biological properties. This study investigates the impact of the newly deposited tephra blanket from the 2021 Tajogaite eruption (La Palma Island) on the molecular composition of soil organic matter and microbial diversity across different soil horizons. A combination of 16S and 18S rRNA gene sequencing, pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), and elemental and isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA/IRMS) was employed. Our results demonstrate that tephra deposits significantly modify the organic matter composition of the underlying soils, promoting microbial activity linked to the degradation and transformation of organic carbon and nitrogen compounds. The soil horizon directly beneath the tephra layer (horizon O) displayed a higher abundance of labile organic compounds and a reduced presence of recalcitrant compounds compared to the deeper horizons (A and Bw). This pattern is strongly associated with the predominance of thermophilic bacteria, which contribute actively to the breakdown of complex organic materials such as lignin and hydrocarbons, and drive key biogeochemical processes including nitrogen and carbon cycling. The continuous geothermal influence of nearby fumaroles further supports the persistence and ecological success of thermophilic communities in these volcanic soils. These findings underscore the critical role of volcanic activity not only in reshaping soil structure but also in enhancing soil fertility and resilience through microbial-mediated processes. Understanding these dynamics is essential for soil management and ecosystem recovery strategies in volcanic regions, providing new insights into the long-term effects of tephra deposition on soil health and the carbon cycle.
- Preprint
(1251 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(697 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Jan 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2086', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Nov 2025
reply
1 关键假设:引言最后陈述了研究目标,但缺乏明确的科学假设。这使得读者很难事先建立预期的逻辑框架。2 方法描述样本过多且无序。凋落物特性分析以及 DNA 提取、PCR 扩增和 Illumina MiSeq 测序样本过多。引物序列是什么?生物信息学分析和统计处理完全不同。本节不包含生物信息学分析。3 微生物样本的取样方法尚不清楚。是混合样本吗?包括重复多少次?该方法描述了 5 个样本的测定。但微生物学结果中的数据没有反映重复,没有生物统计学意义。4 根据论文规则,建议根据结果和讨论分章写。5 微生物剖面的结果过于简单化。建议增加对土壤元素和土壤微生物的分析。ReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-2086-RC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 696 | 116 | 21 | 833 | 49 | 18 | 37 |
- HTML: 696
- PDF: 116
- XML: 21
- Total: 833
- Supplement: 49
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 37
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1