the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
All-sky AMSU-A radiance data assimilation using the gain-form of Local Ensemble Transform Kalman filter within MPAS-JEDI-2.1.0: implementation, tuning, and evaluation
Abstract. The Gain-form of Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LGETKF) has been implemented in the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) with the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) (i.e., MPAS-JEDI). LGETKF applies vertical localization in model space and is particularly convenient for assimilating satellite radiances that do not have an explicit vertical height assigned to each channel. Additional efforts are made to optimize the ensemble analysis procedure and improve the computational efficiency of MPAS-JEDI's LGETKF. This is the first application of JEDI-based LGETKF for assimilating radiance data in all-weather situations with a global MPAS configuration. The system is firstly tuned for covariance inflation and horizontal localization settings. It is found that using a combination of relaxation to prior perturbation (RTPP) and relaxation to prior spread (RTPS) outperforms using RTPP or RTPS alone, and using a smaller horizontal localization scale for all-sky radiances is preferable. With the optimized inflation and localization settings, assimilating all-sky radiances of the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit – A (AMSU-A) window channels with an 80-member LGETKF improved the forecasts of moisture, wind, clouds, and precipitation fields, when compared to the benchmark experiment without assimilation of all-sky AMSU-A radiances. The positive forecast impact of all-sky AMSU-A radiances is the largest over the tropical regions up to 7-day. Some degradation on the temperature forecasts is seen over certain regions, where the model forecast is likely biased, causing deficiencies for assimilating all-sky data. The LGETKF capability is available in the recent public release of MPAS-JEDI and ready for research and operational explorations.
- Preprint
(7671 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 10 Jul 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2079', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Jun 2025
reply
This paper evaluates the impacts of assimilating all-sky radiance observations using the LGETKF implementation within the MPAS-JEDI framework. The LGETKF solver is particularly suitable for this observation type, as it performs model-space localization that does not require an explicit vertical coordinate for the observations. The authors discuss improvements to the computational efficiency of the LGETKF and explore tuning strategies for covariance inflation and localization. Following these developments, the assimilation of all-sky radiance observations in a global MPAS simulation yields improvements in many atmospheric fields, with the exception of temperature.
Overall, the manuscript is clearly written and well structured. While much of the scientific content aligns closely with findings from earlier studies (and therefore may not be especially novel), the paper’s main contribution lies in its application of the new JEDI system, particularly the global implementation of LGETKF within MPAS-JEDI. Given the emerging importance of JEDI for both operational and research-oriented data assimilation systems, this study provides timely and valuable insight into the system’s performance, optimal configuration, and computational behavior. In this context, I find the manuscript suitable for publication, provided that a few minor issues are addressed (see attached PDF). A slightly stronger focus on the novelty and implications of using the JEDI system would also enhance the paper’s contribution.
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2079', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Jun 2025
reply
This study used the LGETKF implementation within the MPAS-JEDI system with a global MPAS model and compared the impact of assimilating all-sky AMSU-A radiance with the assimilation of clear-sky AMSU-A radiance. The study tested a few inflation and localization configurations and used a satisfactory combination. The impact of assimilating all-sky AMSU-A radiance relative to clear-sky AMSU-A radiance is generally consistent with previous studies, showing positive impact on the short-term and long-term forecasts in wind and moisture, and some degradation in temperature in the southern hemisphere. Although all-sky AMSU-A radiance is only assimilated over the water, verifications using radiosondes show that the influence propagates over the land in a few days, showing mostly global improvements in forecast accuracy.
This paper is overall well prepared, constructed, and presented. I have a few concerns, but none of them are major, and this paper should be ready for publication with a handful of minor revisions. My comments are listed below.
1. The novelty of this study is not exactly clear to me. The implementation of LGETKF to MPAS-JEDI was done by a previous work, and a similar study assessing the impact of all-sky AMSU-A radiance using MPAS-JEDI, albeit 3DEnVar instead of EnKF, and did not include clear-sky MHS radiance as in the study, was already performed with similar conclusions. It would be helpful to refine the scope and highlight the novelty of this current study.
2. The two sensitivity experiments with different inflation parameters ("AllSky-RTPS" and "AllSky-RTPP") are not an apple-to-apple comparison to the final experiment ("AllSky"). More suitable configurations would be either 1) AllSky-RTPS uses αRTPS=0.9 and AllSky-RTPP uses αRTPP=0.5, or 2) AllSky-RTPS uses αRTPS=1.0 and αRTPP=0.5, and AllSky-RTPP uses αRTPS=0.9 and αRTPS=0.7. These configurations will ensure that there is only one parameter different in these two sensitivity experiments compared with the "AllSky" experiment, and the difference should be completely a result of this specific parameter, while the comparison now actually includes influences from both αRTPS and αRTPP.
Other comments:
Line 74: Mentioning OOPS is the data assimilation solver component of JEDI might be helpful for the readers who are not familiar with the structure of JEDI.
Line 86: "...is when..." -> "...is applied when..."
Line 144: What does excluding thinned observations mean? If it is referring to data thinning, it might be better to say something like "unused observations after data thinning."
Table 2 and Figure 10: It might be helpful to list the frequencies of the channels.
Line 207: There are two "use"s.
Line 210: "significant CWL content" -- how much?
Table 3: For ClrSky and AllSky, the second αRTPS should likely be αRTPP.
Line 279: "model level 50" -- there is no mention of the total number of model levels and how they are distributed.
Figure 2: In my opinion, the x-axis label should be "assimilation time"; "assimilation cycles" should correspond to 1, 2, 3, ... etc.
Line 361: "NOOA" -> "NOAA".
Line 445-446: Without a clear statement on the novelty of this study, I'm not sure about the accuracy of this sentence.
Financial support: The grant number listed here is a NOAA grant number, not a USAF one.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2079-RC2
Data sets
Global Forecast System analyses National Centers For Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department Of Commerce https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds084.1/
Global Ensemble Forecast System ensemble analyses NOAA https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/weather-climate-models/global-ensemble-forecast
Conventional and satellite observations National Centers For Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/d337000
Conventional and satellite observations National Centers For Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department Of Commerce https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/d735000/
ATMS radiance data NOAA https://sounder.gesdisc.eosdis.nasa.gov/opendap
Model code and software
MPAS-JEDI 2.1.0 Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation & National Center for Atmospheric Research https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15201032
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
108 | 22 | 4 | 134 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 108
- PDF: 22
- XML: 4
- Total: 134
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1