Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1989
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1989
12 Jun 2025
 | 12 Jun 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Mixed Layer Height Retrievals Using MicroPulse Differential Absorption Lidar

Luke Colberg, Kevin S. Repasky, Matthew Hayman, Robert A. Stillwell, and Scott M. Spuler

Abstract. Accurate measurement of the mixed layer height (MLH) is a key observational capability necessary for many studies in weather forecasting, air quality assessment, and surface-atmosphere exchange. However, continuous MLH monitoring with backscatter lidars remains challenging under complex atmospheric conditions, including cloudy conditions and in the presence of residual layers. This study evaluates two complementary MLH retrieval algorithms using a single MicroPulse differential absorption lidar (MPD): an aerosol-based approach that analyzes aerosol backscatter gradients with a wavelet technique and a thermodynamic technique based on the vertical structure of virtual potential temperature profiles. Both techniques were compared against MLH estimates from radiosondes, a Doppler wind lidar, and a high-resolution weather model. The aerosol method achieved high temporal resolution and agreement with radiosonde MLH estimates under convective conditions (R2 = 0.819–0.919), but its MLH estimates deviated from other methods during morning and evening transitions due to residual layer interference. The thermodynamic method avoided these problems but had coarser resolution and degraded instrument performance beneath clouds (R2 = 0.661–0.845). The study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Together, they offer a path toward more reliable automatic MLH monitoring with a single instrument by capturing when different MLH definitions converge.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Luke Colberg, Kevin S. Repasky, Matthew Hayman, Robert A. Stillwell, and Scott M. Spuler

Status: open (until 21 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Luke Colberg, Kevin S. Repasky, Matthew Hayman, Robert A. Stillwell, and Scott M. Spuler
Luke Colberg, Kevin S. Repasky, Matthew Hayman, Robert A. Stillwell, and Scott M. Spuler

Viewed

Total article views: 143 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
109 25 9 143 4 13
  • HTML: 109
  • PDF: 25
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 143
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 142 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
Two methods were developed to measure the mixed layer height, an important variable for weather forecasting and air quality studies. An aerosol-based method and a thermodynamic method were tested using a lidar system that can measure vertical profiles of aerosols, humidity, and temperature. Each method performed best under different conditions. Together, they provide a path toward more reliable mixed layer height monitoring with a single instrument.
Share