Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1812
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1812
30 Apr 2025
 | 30 Apr 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).

Reconstructing landscapes: an adjoint model of the Stream Power and diffusion erosion equation

Carole Petit, Anthony Jourdon, and Nicolas Coltice

Abstract. We simulate landscape evolution using a diffusion–advection equation, where the advection velocity is derived from the erodibility parameters of the Stream Power Law. This formulation allows for forward modeling within a finite-element framework, and enables the use of adjoint methods for sensitivity analysis and parameter inversion – specifically for spatially variable erodibility and diffusion coefficients. When considered individually, model parameters such as the diffusion coefficient, erodibility, initial topography, and time-dependent uplift can be inverted using constraints from final topography, sediment flux, or cumulative denudation at specific locations. Sensitivity analysis on a real landscape reveals that sensitivity to erosion parameters is higher in steep, high-relief areas and that hillslope diffusion and fluvial incision affect the model differently. We apply the adjoint model to two natural cases: (1) reconstructing the pre-incision topography of the southeastern French Massif Central, which appears as a smooth, flat footwall bounded by a linear escarpment along a major lithological boundary; and (2) estimating the Quaternary uplift rate along the Wasatch Range, USA, where our model suggests a significant increase in uplift from 0.2 to 1 mm.yr-1 over the last ∼2 million years, consistent with recent geological estimates.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Carole Petit, Anthony Jourdon, and Nicolas Coltice

Status: open (until 11 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Carole Petit, Anthony Jourdon, and Nicolas Coltice
Carole Petit, Anthony Jourdon, and Nicolas Coltice

Viewed

Total article views: 103 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
87 13 3 103 4 3
  • HTML: 87
  • PDF: 13
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 103
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 116 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 116 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 May 2025
Download
Short summary
We usually simulate how landscapes evolve by starting from an imaginary situation in the past, and applying physical laws to simulate the effect of erosion and tectonics. Here, we reverse the approach: starting from today's landscape, we work backwards to find out how it has evolved. Using a simple physical description of erosive and tectonic processes, we can infer which areas are more sensitive to erosion, or how the landscape looked like before erosion, or how fast it has been uplifting.
Share