Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1811
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1811
12 May 2025
 | 12 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Apparent vertical ionospheric drift: A Comparative Assessment of Digisonde and Ionogram-Based Methods

Daniel Kouba, Zbyšek Mošna, and Petra Koucká Knížová

Abstract. Reliable estimation of vertical plasma drift in the ionosphere is crucial for interpreting ionospheric dynamics and enhancing the accuracy of space weather models. This study provides a comparative assessment of direct Digisonde Drift Measurements (DDM) and indirect ionogram-based methods using parameters such as hmF2, h′F2, h′(3.5 MHz), and h⁠′(0.8foF2). Two high cadence measurement campaigns were conducted at the mid-latitude observatory in Pruhonice, Czech Republic, during different phases of the solar cycle. The analysis focuses on evaluating measurement consistency, temporal coherence, and the influence of sampling step and averaging strategy on drift estimation. While DDM yields stable and robust results even at one-minute resolution, ionogram-derived methods are strongly affected by measurement uncertainty and ambiguity in virtual height interpretation – particularly at short time scales. However, at night, all methods converge when a 15-minute time interval is consistently applied both as the computation step and for subsequent smoothing. Under these conditions, coherent wave-like features in the vertical drift are reliably captured. The study outlines the strengths and limitations of each technique and provides recommendations for optimizing temporal resolution in ionospheric drift measurements, supporting improved methodology for future observational campaigns and model validation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Daniel Kouba, Zbyšek Mošna, and Petra Koucká Knížová

Status: open (until 20 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1811', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Jun 2025 reply
Daniel Kouba, Zbyšek Mošna, and Petra Koucká Knížová
Daniel Kouba, Zbyšek Mošna, and Petra Koucká Knížová

Viewed

Total article views: 96 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
83 7 6 96 5 4
  • HTML: 83
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 96
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 100 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 100 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
Understanding how the upper atmosphere moves is important for improving radio communication and satellite navigation. We compared two techniques that use radio signals from the ground to estimate vertical motion – one based on direct Doppler shifts, the other on changes in reflection height. We found that under certain conditions, especially at night and with proper timing, the results from both methods are comparable and consistent.
Share