Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1755
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1755
25 Apr 2025
 | 25 Apr 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Using GNSS-based vegetation optical depth, tree sway motion, and eddy-covariance to examine evaporation of canopy-intercepted rainfall in a subalpine forest

Sean P. Burns, Vincent Humphrey, Ethan D. Gutmann, Mark S. Raleigh, David R. Bowling, and Peter D. Blanken

Abstract. Recent advances in the measurement of water content within a forest, have led to new possibilities to study canopy evaporation. We used a pair of Global Navigation Satellite System GNSS receivers (one above the canopy and one near the forest floor) to calculate the vegetation optical depth VOD during the warm season in a Colorado subalpine forest. One goal in our study was to compare VOD to the concurrent tree sway motion and subcanopy/above-canopy eddy-covariance evapotranspiration ET measurements. We found that VOD increased and tree sway frequency decreased during wet periods; furthermore, both measurements exhibited a linear relationship between each other and suggested that it took around 14 h after rainfall ceased for the intercepted rainwater to fully evaporate from the canopy. On dry days, we found that tree sway was more sensitive to diel changes in internal tree-water content than VOD. The ET measurements provided quantitative estimates of canopy evaporation (0.02 mm h−1 at night, to 0.08 mm h−1 during mid-day). Following rainfall, nighttime VOD, tree sway and ET all showed a steady (nearly constant) drying of the canopy. Variability in the VOD and tree sway measurements, comparisons with water content from the CLM4.5 land-surface model, and challenges with ET measurements, are also discussed.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Sean P. Burns, Vincent Humphrey, Ethan D. Gutmann, Mark S. Raleigh, David R. Bowling, and Peter D. Blanken

Status: open (until 06 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sean P. Burns, Vincent Humphrey, Ethan D. Gutmann, Mark S. Raleigh, David R. Bowling, and Peter D. Blanken

Data sets

US-NR1 AmeriFlux Site Data Peter Blanken, Sean Burns, Russ Monson, Dave Bowling, and Andrew Turnipseed https://doi.org/10.17190/AMF/1246088

Tree Sway Frequency Data Mark Raleigh https://zenodo.org/records/5149308

US-NR1 AmeriFlux Site Supplemental Data Sean P. Burns, Peter D. Blanken, and Russell K. Monson http://dx.doi.org/10.15485/1671825

Sean P. Burns, Vincent Humphrey, Ethan D. Gutmann, Mark S. Raleigh, David R. Bowling, and Peter D. Blanken

Viewed

Total article views: 143 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
111 26 6 143 13 3 3
  • HTML: 111
  • PDF: 26
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 143
  • Supplement: 13
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 143 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 143 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 May 2025
Download
Short summary
We compared two techniques that are affected by the amount of liquid water in a forest canopy. One technique relies on remote sensing (a pair of GPS systems) and the other uses tree motion generated by the wind. Though completely different, these two techniques show strikingly similar changes when rain falls on an evergreen forest. We combine these measurements with eddy-covariance fluxes of water vapor to provide some insight into the evaporation of canopy-intercepted precipitation.
Share