the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Multi-decadal Streamflow Projections for Catchments in Brazil based on CMIP6 Multi-model Simulations and Neural Network Embeddings for Linear Regression Models
Abstract. A linear regression model is developed to link anomalies of streamflow to anomalies of precipitation amounts and temperature with the goal of making multi-decadal streamflow projections based on CMIP6 multi-model simulations. Regression coefficients estimated separately for each catchment and each month show physically implausible spatial patterns and indicate issues with overfitting. An alternative approach is therefore explored in which all regression coefficients are estimated simultaneously through a neural network that retains the original linear model structure, but uses embeddings to map each combination of catchment and month to a set of regression coefficients. The model is demonstrated over a set of catchments in Brazil, where the estimated relationships are used to make streamflow projections for the next decades based on CMIP6 multi-model simulations. It yields physically more plausible relationships between streamflow, precipitation amounts, and temperature for our study area than the locally fitted regression models. The resulting projections indicate reduced streamflow over northern, north-eastern, central, and south-eastern Brazil, especially for the austral spring and summer season. The signal is less clear during austral winter. In southern Brazil, an increase in streamflow is expected.
- Preprint
(3854 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 07 Jul 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1603', Ingrid Petry, 21 May 2025
reply
I recommend the authors to check the following three references, which may be relevant to their work:
-
Brêda, J.P.L.F., de Paiva, R.C.D., Collischon, W. et al. Climate change impacts on South American water balance from a continental-scale hydrological model driven by CMIP5 projections. Climatic Change 159, 503–522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02667-9
- Brêda, J.P.L.F., et al., 2020. Climate change impacts on South American water balance from a continental-scale hydrological model driven by CMIP5 projections. Climatic Change, 159 (4), 503–522. doi:10.1007/s10584-020-02667-9
- Petry, I., Miranda, P. T., Paiva, R. C. D., Collischonn, W., Fan, F. M., Fagundes, H. O., et al. (2025). Changes in flood magnitude and frequency projected for vulnerable regions and major wetlands of south America. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, e2024GL112436. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112436
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1603-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Michael Scheuerer, 02 Jun 2025
reply
Thanks for sharing the references! I have now had a chance to read the two (1 and 2 are identical) papers and they are relevant indeed and allow us to compare the projected changes we obtained with our ML model with projections with a hydrological model.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1603-AC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Ingrid Petry, 02 Jun 2025
reply
I'm sorry, the second paper was supposed to be the following:
2. Brêda, J. P. L., de Paiva, R. C. D., Siqueira, V. A., & Collischonn, W. (2023). Assessing climate change impact on flood discharge in South America and the influence of its main drivers. Journal of Hydrology, 619, 129284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129284I'm glad to help!
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1603-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Ingrid Petry, 02 Jun 2025
reply
-
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1603', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Jun 2025
reply
- I suggest revising the study area map, adding coordinates, north arrow, scale.
-Some litreture reviews can be added about hybrid statistical-physical models in introduction.
-You are using different data sources CHIRPS vs. ERA5, dis you do some sensivity check analyses?
-Have you think about physical relationships between temperature and vapor pressure of water (like considering clausius-claperyon equation)?
-Considering nearest grid point, did you use orographic effects?
-I suggest adding skill scores as well for climatology.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1603-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1603', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Jun 2025
reply
I would like to commend the authors for a clear and rigorous manuscript that adheres well to the principle of Ockham’s razor. The attention given to model interpretability is particularly appreciated. I believe the manuscript is suitable for publication in its current form. I have only one minor comment: could the authors clarify why the CatchmendID pipeline was separated from the Month pipeline in the neural network architecture? A brief explanation would be helpful.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1603-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
169 | 32 | 12 | 213 | 9 | 10 |
- HTML: 169
- PDF: 32
- XML: 12
- Total: 213
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1