Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-16
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-16
10 Feb 2025
 | 10 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Predictive Performances of Machine Learning– and Deep Learning–Based Univariate and Multivariate Reservoir Inflow Predictions in the Chao Phraya River Basin

Jidapa Kraisangka, Pheeranat Dornpunya, Areeya Rittima, Wudhichart Sawangphol, Yutthana Phankamolsil, Allan Sriratana Tabucanon, Yutthana Talaluxmana, and Varawoot Vudhivanich

Abstract. This study demonstrated the predictability of Machine Learning (ML)– and Deep Learning (DL)–based univariate and multivariate predictions of reservoir inflows of Bhumibol (BB) and Sirikit (SK), two major dams in the Chao Phraya River Basin. XGBoost, tree–based ensemble–, and LSTM, deep neural network–based algorithms were selected for development of daily and monthly prediction models. For univariate prediction, the inflows of the BB and SK dams were predicted separately using two individual models. In contrast, for multivariate prediction, a single model was developed to simultaneously predict the inflows of both the BB and SK dams facilitating the integrated decision–making processes. Across all prediction scenarios, ML– and DL–based models demonstrated superior performances in predicting daily reservoir inflows for BB and SK dams compared to monthly predictions, achieving NSE values of 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Since modeling with LSTM algorithm can effectively handle larger datasets, this enables single multivariate prediction model to predict closer results to those individual univariate models performed by XGBoost and LSTM for BB and SK prediction. XGBoost models mostly outperformed LSTM when tested on the datasets for both daily and monthly univariate predictions. Among all prediction scenarios, underprediction of low reservoir inflows and overprediction of high reservoir inflows by both univariate and multivariate models were consistently existed. Therefore, extracting specific and informative insights from the results of each model type, forecasting horizon, and algorithms used can significantly enhance decision–making support for both real–time reservoir operation and long–term reservoir management planning.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Jidapa Kraisangka, Pheeranat Dornpunya, Areeya Rittima, Wudhichart Sawangphol, Yutthana Phankamolsil, Allan Sriratana Tabucanon, Yutthana Talaluxmana, and Varawoot Vudhivanich

Status: open (until 15 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jidapa Kraisangka, Pheeranat Dornpunya, Areeya Rittima, Wudhichart Sawangphol, Yutthana Phankamolsil, Allan Sriratana Tabucanon, Yutthana Talaluxmana, and Varawoot Vudhivanich
Jidapa Kraisangka, Pheeranat Dornpunya, Areeya Rittima, Wudhichart Sawangphol, Yutthana Phankamolsil, Allan Sriratana Tabucanon, Yutthana Talaluxmana, and Varawoot Vudhivanich

Viewed

Total article views: 142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
115 22 5 142 4 4
  • HTML: 115
  • PDF: 22
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 142
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 118 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 118 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 19 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
This study demonstrated predictability of Machine Learning and Deep Learning–based prediction models to predict daily and monthly reservoir inflows of Bhumibol and Sirikit dams. Input features selection and configuration model design were definitely highlighted. Two univariate models were developed for separate inflow predictions at each reservoir, while a single multivariate model was developed to simultaneously predict both inflows, supporting integrated decision-making within the river basin.
Share