the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comparing Multi-Model Ensemble Simulations with Observations and Decadal Projections of Upper Atmospheric Variations Following the Hunga Eruption
Abstract. The Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai Model-Observation Comparison (HTHH-MOC) project aims to comprehensively investigate the evolution of volcanic water vapor and sulfur emissions and their subsequent atmospheric impacts and underlying response mechanisms using state-of-the art global climate models. This study evaluates multi-model ensemble simulations participating in the HTHH-MOC free-run experiment with climate projections for 10 years (2022–2032). Model results are evaluated against satellite observations to assess their ability to reproduce the observed evolution of stratospheric water vapor, aerosols, temperature, and ozone from 2022 to 2024. The participating models accurately capture the observed distribution patterns and associated upper atmospheric responses, providing confidence for their future projections. Model simulations suggest that the Hunga eruption-induced stratospheric water vapor anomaly lasts 4–7 years, with a water vapor e-folding time of 31–43 months. This prolonged water vapor perturbation leads to significant local cooling, resulting in significant ozone loss in the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere for 7–10 years. Comparisons between simulations with both SO2 and H2O emissions and those with H2O-only emissions indicate that the pronounced dipole response with upper-stratospheric cooling and lower-stratospheric warming is driven by the combined effects of SO2 and H2O injections. These results highlight the prolonged atmospheric impacts of the Hunga eruption and the potential critical role of stratospheric water vapor in modulating long-term atmospheric chemistry and dynamics.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(1986 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 06 Jun 2025)
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
106 | 17 | 7 | 130 | 6 | 7 |
- HTML: 106
- PDF: 17
- XML: 7
- Total: 130
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1